Skip to main content

Personal: Life Beyond Startups

I've gone to a lot of talks recently focused on startups. Personally, I've spent more than a decade at more than 10 different startups, and I certainly think startups are a heck of a lot of fun. However, I'm beginning to think they're a bit overrated. Some of the talks I've gone to lately almost suggest that doing your own startup is the only path to happiness and personal fulfillment. Let me dispel that myth.

First of all, not everything can be accomplished by two guys and a spare garage. Apple started out in a garage, as did the Wright brothers. However, the sleek MacBook Pro that I'm currently typing on bares little resemblance to the Apple I. There have been thousands of people needed to make Apple what it is today. The same is true of Google as well. Google is way more than just a search engine these days!

The Wright brothers may have been the first ones to successfully put a man in an airplane, but a Boeing 747 isn't something that can be accomplished by two guys and a garage. Similarly, it took a lot more than two guys and a garage to put a guy on the moon. The freeway that I drove on to get to work today may have been envisioned by some guy in Germany in the 1930's, but actually building the freeway took a lot more effort than is possible by one man. I definitely admire Linus Torvalds for creating Linux, but it has taken thousands of skilled hackers to build and package all the software present in a modern Linux distro.

A lot of these talks also seem to suggest that people at startups are happier and co-workers are smarter. Sometimes that's true, but it's definitely not always true. I've been very unhappy at a lot of startups, especially when I was burnt out from being overworked, and I wasn't sure there was going to be enough money left to pay my rent! I may be a bit biased considering I work at Google, but I think that my current co-workers are some of the smartest, friendliest, and happiest people I've ever worked with. I know I'm definitely enjoying myself!

Everything has to start somewhere, and it's a lot of fun to start new things. However, there are many very worthwhile things that take a massive amount of manpower to accomplish. So let's not forget all those people who aren't famous who nonetheless made it possible to fully accomplish many of the most monumental and influential things all around us!


God Shannon,
You spoke my mind out. Living here in NYC, it seems every meetup group I go to has a lot of self promoting startups than technology enthusiasts.
While I am not not averse to a little self promotion (hello, I do live in Donald Trump land), this just takes it too far.

jjinux said…
Thanks for the confirmation, Nathan ;)

Popular posts from this blog

Ubuntu 20.04 on a 2015 15" MacBook Pro

I decided to give Ubuntu 20.04 a try on my 2015 15" MacBook Pro. I didn't actually install it; I just live booted from a USB thumb drive which was enough to try out everything I wanted. In summary, it's not perfect, and issues with my camera would prevent me from switching, but given the right hardware, I think it's a really viable option. The first thing I wanted to try was what would happen if I plugged in a non-HiDPI screen given that my laptop has a HiDPI screen. Without sub-pixel scaling, whatever scale rate I picked for one screen would apply to the other. However, once I turned on sub-pixel scaling, I was able to pick different scale rates for the internal and external displays. That looked ok. I tried plugging in and unplugging multiple times, and it didn't crash. I doubt it'd work with my Thunderbolt display at work, but it worked fine for my HDMI displays at home. I even plugged it into my TV, and it stuck to the 100% scaling I picked for the othe

ERNOS: Erlang Networked Operating System

I've been reading Dreaming in Code lately, and I really like it. If you're not a dreamer, you may safely skip the rest of this post ;) In Chapter 10, "Engineers and Artists", Alan Kay, John Backus, and Jaron Lanier really got me thinking. I've also been thinking a lot about Minix 3 , Erlang , and the original Lisp machine . The ideas are beginning to synthesize into something cohesive--more than just the sum of their parts. Now, I'm sure that many of these ideas have already been envisioned within , LLVM , Microsoft's Singularity project, or in some other place that I haven't managed to discover or fully read, but I'm going to blog them anyway. Rather than wax philosophical, let me just dump out some ideas: Start with Minix 3. It's a new microkernel, and it's meant for real use, unlike the original Minix. "This new OS is extremely small, with the part that runs in kernel mode under 4000 lines of executable code.&quo

Haskell or Erlang?

I've coded in both Erlang and Haskell. Erlang is practical, efficient, and useful. It's got a wonderful niche in the distributed world, and it has some real success stories such as CouchDB and Haskell is elegant and beautiful. It's been successful in various programming language competitions. I have some experience in both, but I'm thinking it's time to really commit to learning one of them on a professional level. They both have good books out now, and it's probably time I read one of those books cover to cover. My question is which? Back in 2000, Perl had established a real niche for systems administration, CGI, and text processing. The syntax wasn't exactly beautiful (unless you're into that sort of thing), but it was popular and mature. Python hadn't really become popular, nor did it really have a strong niche (at least as far as I could see). I went with Python because of its elegance, but since then, I've coded both p