Skip to main content

Linux on the Desktop

I'm a Linux guy at heart, but I use a Mac. For a long time, I've had a weird love hate relationship with Apple laptops. I was feeling a bit nostalgic today, and I stumbled across these articles:

It reminds me of The UNIX-Haters Handbook, which as a fantastic read :) Warning, do not read any of the above if you're easily offended!

Who would have thought that Linux would be more successful in the mobile world than on the desktop? Who could have guessed that one of the most successful Linux on the desktop projects would actually embrace trusted platform modules and restrict access to the shell by default (unless you put it in developer mode)? What a strange world we live in!

Comments

metapundit.net said…
Yup. . Just got a Mac laptop last week after running nothing but Linux on all my computers for 6 years. Still getting used to the Mac way of doing things but hoping to at least have new bugs to complain about.
jjinux said…
Does that mean you won't make fun of me at BayPiggies when I show up with a Mac? ;)
Jack Sherr said…
I would totally make fun of you :P Earlier this year, I made the decision to forsake both Apple and Microsoft as operating system providers, mostly for the same reason in each case: I don't feel like they have my interests at heart. I can't stand the thought of either company making arbitrary decisions on fundamental concepts like where I buy my software, or how the desktop should be laid out. Until earlier this year, I was using Windows 7 and then I saw the future that is Windows 8 and "iOS for Mac". It made me angry to think that such bad design decisions were being made upstream and for the wrong reasons. Note that "bad" and "wrong" are indeed subjective, but from my subjective standpoint, they are real. The problem was that I was feeling less "free" all the time. Everything little thing that I wanted to change about my OS X experience or Windows experience was being turned into "you'll void your warranty" threats. I don't know how to describe it, but having moved into the Linux world, I feel like I no longer have to answer to anyone - I can do whatever I like with _my_ computer, and no one is going to give me a hard time. If I don't the file system, I change it; if I don't like the window manager or desktop environment, I change it; or maybe I don't want Twitter and Facebook integrated into my O/S, thank you very much. It just seems that it's turning into a constant battle to beat back Apple or Microsoft from pushing unpleasant and unsolicited "helpful" changes onto my computing experience. Anyway, sorry for the unexpected rant - it's been a long day :)
Matt said…
Interesting... My movement was in the opposite direction (from Mac to Linux about 5 years ago) and I haven't looked back. For me, easy installation of the latest and greatest packages together with the power to configure everything far outweighed the user-friendliness of the Mac. I found that the Mac's ease of use was largely superficial. OS X makes ordinary computing tasks a bit simpler; but trying to do anything unusual --- e.g., installing dependencies for an obscure *nix package, running an alternate window manager, keeping up with Emacs development, etc. --- could make life much more difficult.

(But, then, my spouse uses a Mac laptop, so I can always grab it when I want to watch a Netflix movie.)
jjinux said…
Hey, John, you're preaching to the choir, brother! I totally understand where you're coming from! I've been a Linux guy since college, 13 years ago. Nonetheless, all the things I linked to are pretty entertaining reading ;)

Hey, Matt! I don't have anything else useful to say ;)

Popular posts from this blog

Ubuntu 20.04 on a 2015 15" MacBook Pro

I decided to give Ubuntu 20.04 a try on my 2015 15" MacBook Pro. I didn't actually install it; I just live booted from a USB thumb drive which was enough to try out everything I wanted. In summary, it's not perfect, and issues with my camera would prevent me from switching, but given the right hardware, I think it's a really viable option. The first thing I wanted to try was what would happen if I plugged in a non-HiDPI screen given that my laptop has a HiDPI screen. Without sub-pixel scaling, whatever scale rate I picked for one screen would apply to the other. However, once I turned on sub-pixel scaling, I was able to pick different scale rates for the internal and external displays. That looked ok. I tried plugging in and unplugging multiple times, and it didn't crash. I doubt it'd work with my Thunderbolt display at work, but it worked fine for my HDMI displays at home. I even plugged it into my TV, and it stuck to the 100% scaling I picked for the othe

ERNOS: Erlang Networked Operating System

I've been reading Dreaming in Code lately, and I really like it. If you're not a dreamer, you may safely skip the rest of this post ;) In Chapter 10, "Engineers and Artists", Alan Kay, John Backus, and Jaron Lanier really got me thinking. I've also been thinking a lot about Minix 3 , Erlang , and the original Lisp machine . The ideas are beginning to synthesize into something cohesive--more than just the sum of their parts. Now, I'm sure that many of these ideas have already been envisioned within Tunes.org , LLVM , Microsoft's Singularity project, or in some other place that I haven't managed to discover or fully read, but I'm going to blog them anyway. Rather than wax philosophical, let me just dump out some ideas: Start with Minix 3. It's a new microkernel, and it's meant for real use, unlike the original Minix. "This new OS is extremely small, with the part that runs in kernel mode under 4000 lines of executable code.&quo

Haskell or Erlang?

I've coded in both Erlang and Haskell. Erlang is practical, efficient, and useful. It's got a wonderful niche in the distributed world, and it has some real success stories such as CouchDB and jabber.org. Haskell is elegant and beautiful. It's been successful in various programming language competitions. I have some experience in both, but I'm thinking it's time to really commit to learning one of them on a professional level. They both have good books out now, and it's probably time I read one of those books cover to cover. My question is which? Back in 2000, Perl had established a real niche for systems administration, CGI, and text processing. The syntax wasn't exactly beautiful (unless you're into that sort of thing), but it was popular and mature. Python hadn't really become popular, nor did it really have a strong niche (at least as far as I could see). I went with Python because of its elegance, but since then, I've coded both p