Skip to main content

PyCon: Storm: the Hadoop of Realtime Stream Processing

See the website.

"Storm: Keeping it Real(time)."

Storm is from dotCloud which is a platform to scale web apps.

They're in the MEGA-DATA zone.

They were using RRD.

Storm is real-time, computation framework.

It can do distributed RPC and stream processing.

It focuses on continuous computation, such as counting all the things passing by on a stream.

Storm does for real-time what Hadoop does for batch processing.

It is a high-volume, distributed, horizontally scalable, continuous system.

Even if the control layer goes down, computation can keep going.

It's strategy for handling failures is to die and recover quickly.

It is fault tolerant, but not fault proof.

Data is processed at least once. With more work and massaging, they have support for "exactly once".

Storm does not handle persistence.

If failures happen, it resubmits stuff through the system.

It doesn't process batches reliability.

It complements Hadoop, but does not attempt to replace Hadoop.

It does not protect against human error.

He suggested that one day we'll use a mix of batching and streaming to get the benefits of both.

Storm has three core elements:
  1. Sprouts inject data into the system. This could be data from a queue. This could be data from the Twitter firehose.
  2. Streams are an unbounded sequence of storm tuples. These are like named tuples. All tuples of the same stream must have same "shape".
  3. Bolts take inputs and transform them to make output streams. 0 or more inputs produces 0 or more outputs. Most of the computation happens here.
Sprouts and bolts can both produce multiple output streams.

A topology is a set of sprouts and bolts connected by streams.

This is a higher-level abstraction than message passing.

All of this is done over 0mq. It uses ZooKeeper for discovery. Storm simplifies all of this.

They're handling 10k-100k requests per second at their company.

Storm is JVM based. It's a 50/50 mix of Java and Clojure. It has a multilingual API. Script bolts can be written using a thin shell that shells out to Python.

"Umbrella" protects you from the Storm. It lets you use Storm pretty much Java free.

He's using nested classes for declarative programming.

He deployed it on DOTCLOUD.

A storm topology can even have cycles.


Popular posts from this blog

Ubuntu 20.04 on a 2015 15" MacBook Pro

I decided to give Ubuntu 20.04 a try on my 2015 15" MacBook Pro. I didn't actually install it; I just live booted from a USB thumb drive which was enough to try out everything I wanted. In summary, it's not perfect, and issues with my camera would prevent me from switching, but given the right hardware, I think it's a really viable option. The first thing I wanted to try was what would happen if I plugged in a non-HiDPI screen given that my laptop has a HiDPI screen. Without sub-pixel scaling, whatever scale rate I picked for one screen would apply to the other. However, once I turned on sub-pixel scaling, I was able to pick different scale rates for the internal and external displays. That looked ok. I tried plugging in and unplugging multiple times, and it didn't crash. I doubt it'd work with my Thunderbolt display at work, but it worked fine for my HDMI displays at home. I even plugged it into my TV, and it stuck to the 100% scaling I picked for the othe

ERNOS: Erlang Networked Operating System

I've been reading Dreaming in Code lately, and I really like it. If you're not a dreamer, you may safely skip the rest of this post ;) In Chapter 10, "Engineers and Artists", Alan Kay, John Backus, and Jaron Lanier really got me thinking. I've also been thinking a lot about Minix 3 , Erlang , and the original Lisp machine . The ideas are beginning to synthesize into something cohesive--more than just the sum of their parts. Now, I'm sure that many of these ideas have already been envisioned within , LLVM , Microsoft's Singularity project, or in some other place that I haven't managed to discover or fully read, but I'm going to blog them anyway. Rather than wax philosophical, let me just dump out some ideas: Start with Minix 3. It's a new microkernel, and it's meant for real use, unlike the original Minix. "This new OS is extremely small, with the part that runs in kernel mode under 4000 lines of executable code.&quo

Haskell or Erlang?

I've coded in both Erlang and Haskell. Erlang is practical, efficient, and useful. It's got a wonderful niche in the distributed world, and it has some real success stories such as CouchDB and Haskell is elegant and beautiful. It's been successful in various programming language competitions. I have some experience in both, but I'm thinking it's time to really commit to learning one of them on a professional level. They both have good books out now, and it's probably time I read one of those books cover to cover. My question is which? Back in 2000, Perl had established a real niche for systems administration, CGI, and text processing. The syntax wasn't exactly beautiful (unless you're into that sort of thing), but it was popular and mature. Python hadn't really become popular, nor did it really have a strong niche (at least as far as I could see). I went with Python because of its elegance, but since then, I've coded both p