Skip to main content

Python: Increasing the Timeouts for urlfetch in Google App Engine

Google App Engine provides a function, google.appengine.api.urlfetch.fetch, for fetching URLs. I do believe all the other HTTP client libraries are monkey patched to make use of that function, which is written to take advantage of various Google infrastructure. The fetch function has a default timeout of 5 seconds. You can set a higher timeout by passing a deadline parameter, but the maximum is 10 seconds. Unfortunately, passing a deadline keyword parameter is often difficult if it's a third-party library that is making the call to fetch, for instance if you're using the GData client library.

I looked for a way to set the deadline parameter in a more global way, but I couldn't fine one by mere inspection of the code. I came up with the following HACK in order to work around this problem:
# HACK: Monkeypatch google.appengine.api.urlfetch.fetch to increase the
# deadline. This is used by the various client libraries.
def _fetch(*args, **kargs):
from google.appengine.api.urlfetch import _orig_fetch # Import late.
kargs["deadline"] = 10
return _orig_fetch(*args, **kargs)
_fetch.this_is_the_wrapper = True

# HACK: Because of the way the dev app server works when reloading code,
# things are a little tricky here.
from google.appengine.api import urlfetch
if not hasattr(urlfetch.fetch, "this_is_the_wrapper"):
urlfetch._orig_fetch = urlfetch.fetch
urlfetch.fetch = _fetch
else:
assert hasattr(urlfetch, "_orig_fetch")

Comments

Peter said…
To increase the timeout of GData urlfetch calls you can always use the run_on_appengine function call.
For details see the documentation:

http://gdata-python-client.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/pydocs/gdata.alt.appengine.html
Unknown said…
> To increase the timeout of GData urlfetch calls you can always use the run_on_appengine function call.
For details see the documentation:

Thanks. That's what we ended up doing. However, we had multiple libraries, each making HTTP calls, so we had to figure out how to tweak it for each of the client libraries. I've officially asked the GAE team to add some way to set the value globally.

Popular posts from this blog

Ubuntu 20.04 on a 2015 15" MacBook Pro

I decided to give Ubuntu 20.04 a try on my 2015 15" MacBook Pro. I didn't actually install it; I just live booted from a USB thumb drive which was enough to try out everything I wanted. In summary, it's not perfect, and issues with my camera would prevent me from switching, but given the right hardware, I think it's a really viable option. The first thing I wanted to try was what would happen if I plugged in a non-HiDPI screen given that my laptop has a HiDPI screen. Without sub-pixel scaling, whatever scale rate I picked for one screen would apply to the other. However, once I turned on sub-pixel scaling, I was able to pick different scale rates for the internal and external displays. That looked ok. I tried plugging in and unplugging multiple times, and it didn't crash. I doubt it'd work with my Thunderbolt display at work, but it worked fine for my HDMI displays at home. I even plugged it into my TV, and it stuck to the 100% scaling I picked for the othe

ERNOS: Erlang Networked Operating System

I've been reading Dreaming in Code lately, and I really like it. If you're not a dreamer, you may safely skip the rest of this post ;) In Chapter 10, "Engineers and Artists", Alan Kay, John Backus, and Jaron Lanier really got me thinking. I've also been thinking a lot about Minix 3 , Erlang , and the original Lisp machine . The ideas are beginning to synthesize into something cohesive--more than just the sum of their parts. Now, I'm sure that many of these ideas have already been envisioned within Tunes.org , LLVM , Microsoft's Singularity project, or in some other place that I haven't managed to discover or fully read, but I'm going to blog them anyway. Rather than wax philosophical, let me just dump out some ideas: Start with Minix 3. It's a new microkernel, and it's meant for real use, unlike the original Minix. "This new OS is extremely small, with the part that runs in kernel mode under 4000 lines of executable code.&quo

Haskell or Erlang?

I've coded in both Erlang and Haskell. Erlang is practical, efficient, and useful. It's got a wonderful niche in the distributed world, and it has some real success stories such as CouchDB and jabber.org. Haskell is elegant and beautiful. It's been successful in various programming language competitions. I have some experience in both, but I'm thinking it's time to really commit to learning one of them on a professional level. They both have good books out now, and it's probably time I read one of those books cover to cover. My question is which? Back in 2000, Perl had established a real niche for systems administration, CGI, and text processing. The syntax wasn't exactly beautiful (unless you're into that sort of thing), but it was popular and mature. Python hadn't really become popular, nor did it really have a strong niche (at least as far as I could see). I went with Python because of its elegance, but since then, I've coded both p