PyCon: State of Pylons/TurboGears 2/repoze.bfg

State of Pylons/TurboGears 2/repoze.bfg

There are about 2000 people on the Pylons mailing list.

Ben Bangert said that Pylons relies too heavily on subclassing. When people subclass and override stuff in a framework's parent class, it makes it difficult to alter the parent class without breaking people's code.

Side note: The new Pyramid T-shirt is beautifully done, but evil aliens (or anything else for that matter) are a big turn off for me.

Pylons is big, but Ben said that too much of Pylons is dependent on him.

Pylons is merging with repoze.bfg. It's going to be called "The Pylons Project", but it's based on the code in repoze.bfg.

Chris McDonough wrote repoze.bfg. It's a great, but relatively unknown framework. Pylons has better name recognition.

TurboGears 2 is built on Pylons.

The new framework is called Pyramid and is part of "The Pylons Project".

TurboGears 2 and Pylons are going to be maintained together so as not to strand a bunch of legacy projects.

Side note: There were a lot of big beards at this PyCon. Big beards have always been popular among hackers, but it's even more popular right now. I wonder if this has anything to do with the Giants pitching staff and with the Giants winning the World Series.

TurboGears will experiment and innovate on top of Pyramid in the same way it used to experiment and innovate on top of Pylons.

repoze.bfg has a catchphrase: "Plumbing Zope 2 into the WSGI pipeline." It actually doesn't take any code from Zope, but it does borrow some ideas.

There are about 200 people on the repoze.bfg mailing list. It has 100% statement coverage. 100% of the code is documented--if a feature isn't documented, then it doesn't exist. There are 80 committers to the repoze.bfg project!

Pyramid is just repoze.bfg renamed.

There is a Paster template for Pyramid--multiple actually.

These are the features in repoze.bfg: it maps URLs to code; it has an authentication framework; it supports I18N; it supports single file applications as well as larger projects; it makes use of PasteDeploy; it has unit, functional, and integration testing; it uses WSGI; it has great docs; it supports multiple templating engines; it supports Google App Engine; it has plugins; it can serve static files; it has sessions; it has cross site request forgery (CSRF) protection; it supports events; it has good exceptions handling; it supports WSGI middleware; it's extremely fast; it has 100% statement coverage.

One reason that it is so fast is that a lot of work is done at startup so that less work needs to be done at runtime.

It is not a full-stack framework. It has no persistence layer.

It currently has 16 dependencies, but single file applications are still possible.

It is "unopinionated".

Chris (the repoze.bfg guy) said, "I'm a Django fan. I love Django." Obviously, he doesn't think Django is appropriate for all situations.

Pyramid != Zope. It's not Pylons. It's not MVC. Chris hates that term.

Flask may be more appropriate for small projects. Pyramid may be a better fit for larger applications.

Pyramid exposes plug points all over the place.

Pyramid supports row-level security.

There's a Pyramid OpenID library.

They use Lettuce together with a web driver. It can work without Selenium.

WebTest from Ian Bicking looks interesting.

The next version of Pyramid will target Python3.

Paste is in a state of flux, but it's too important to be abandoned.