Skip to main content

Personal: Should I Leave LinkedIn?

I got email from LinkedIn:
Give your productivity a boost - for free!
Exclusive offer: Try LinkedIn Premium free for 1 month*

Dear Shannon -jj,

Find and manage high quality contacts with LinkedIn Premium. Get started today and get 1 month free!.

LinkedIn Premium helps you be great at what you do, with tools such as:

• InMail: Contact anyone on LinkedIn without an introduction - response guaranteed!**
• Expanded Profile Views: See expanded profiles of everyone on LinkedIn, even people outside of your network
• Who's Viewed My Profile: Get the inside scoop on how you're viewed professionally by accessing the complete list

You'll also get a lot more including up to 700 profiles per search.

Your exclusive offer expires soon so get started today!
This means that LinkedIn is going to be making money off of spammy recruiters at my expense. That is really a violation of my trust. Am I wrong? I'm seriously thinking about deleting my account.

Comments

drozzy said…
Got spam from it before. Yeah it's annoying.
The funny thing is that I don't even know why I need linkedin - my friend talked me into it, but over the course of 4 years I got absolutely nothing out of it. Except spam.
Unknown said…
I don't think it will do any good. The way I read it was "Pay us and we will work on showing your curriculum to more people; don't pay and nothing changes".

The idea is a professional network, unlike Facebook, Orkut, etc. It is a more targeted audience and there it is not news that there are recruiters looking for good resources and that we are exposing ourselves to them.

It is just what LinkedIn will give you back that will be changing.

I don't work for them, though, so this is my guess and reading from their email (which I also received).
Anonymous said…
You can turn off the "InMail" feature if you don't want any recruiters contacting you. Go here and choose "Introductions only":
https://www.linkedin.com/settings/email-accept

BTW, I *do* work for LinkedIn now, so feel free to email or call me if you want :)

Popular posts from this blog

Ubuntu 20.04 on a 2015 15" MacBook Pro

I decided to give Ubuntu 20.04 a try on my 2015 15" MacBook Pro. I didn't actually install it; I just live booted from a USB thumb drive which was enough to try out everything I wanted. In summary, it's not perfect, and issues with my camera would prevent me from switching, but given the right hardware, I think it's a really viable option. The first thing I wanted to try was what would happen if I plugged in a non-HiDPI screen given that my laptop has a HiDPI screen. Without sub-pixel scaling, whatever scale rate I picked for one screen would apply to the other. However, once I turned on sub-pixel scaling, I was able to pick different scale rates for the internal and external displays. That looked ok. I tried plugging in and unplugging multiple times, and it didn't crash. I doubt it'd work with my Thunderbolt display at work, but it worked fine for my HDMI displays at home. I even plugged it into my TV, and it stuck to the 100% scaling I picked for the othe

ERNOS: Erlang Networked Operating System

I've been reading Dreaming in Code lately, and I really like it. If you're not a dreamer, you may safely skip the rest of this post ;) In Chapter 10, "Engineers and Artists", Alan Kay, John Backus, and Jaron Lanier really got me thinking. I've also been thinking a lot about Minix 3 , Erlang , and the original Lisp machine . The ideas are beginning to synthesize into something cohesive--more than just the sum of their parts. Now, I'm sure that many of these ideas have already been envisioned within Tunes.org , LLVM , Microsoft's Singularity project, or in some other place that I haven't managed to discover or fully read, but I'm going to blog them anyway. Rather than wax philosophical, let me just dump out some ideas: Start with Minix 3. It's a new microkernel, and it's meant for real use, unlike the original Minix. "This new OS is extremely small, with the part that runs in kernel mode under 4000 lines of executable code.&quo

Haskell or Erlang?

I've coded in both Erlang and Haskell. Erlang is practical, efficient, and useful. It's got a wonderful niche in the distributed world, and it has some real success stories such as CouchDB and jabber.org. Haskell is elegant and beautiful. It's been successful in various programming language competitions. I have some experience in both, but I'm thinking it's time to really commit to learning one of them on a professional level. They both have good books out now, and it's probably time I read one of those books cover to cover. My question is which? Back in 2000, Perl had established a real niche for systems administration, CGI, and text processing. The syntax wasn't exactly beautiful (unless you're into that sort of thing), but it was popular and mature. Python hadn't really become popular, nor did it really have a strong niche (at least as far as I could see). I went with Python because of its elegance, but since then, I've coded both p