Skip to main content

Linux: I'm Lovin' Ubuntu 9.10!

I upgraded to Ubuntu 9.10 on my MacBook (hardware version 4,1), and I'm lovin' it! It's a major improvement, especially since they fixed a lot of the issues that were plaguing me and my MacBook.

I like the new theme and background.

I always swap my control key and my capslock key. Now, hitting control finally makes the capslock key light turn on.

Getting my wireless card to work was easy.

Getting an external monitor to work was much easier than last time. I didn't even have to edit xorg.conf!

Sound works by default, and it sounds better. There was a bug in older versions where the mid-range speaker wasn't turned on.

The touchpad is much better by default, and there's even a user interface to improve it further. I like to turn off touch to tap and switch from edge scrolling to two finger scrolling. The speed and acceleration are perfect by default. Setting up the trackpad so that it wasn't insane was my biggest challenge under Ubuntu 9.04.

Power management continues to be a breeze.

Supposedly all the other things like the iSight camera and microphone are also working well, although I haven't gotten a chance to try them.

I also like the fact that the applets are toned down a bit. It fits in perfectly with my recent sentiments on "calm computing".

Anyway, this is the happiest I've been with Linux in a long time :)

By the way, here's the web page for running Ubuntu 9.10 (Karmic Koala) on a MacBook version 4,1.


ghabuntu said…
Hi. Thanks for your review. This post is one more vindication of my assertion that Ubuntu Karmic is not Canonical's Vista. I wonder why people were expecting full stability from a release that was than a week old.
Brandon L. Golm said…
congrats ... you've figured out that it's now slightly easier to make your macbook slightly not as good.
jjinux said…
Brandon, you don't understand! I hacked my kernel so that whenever I shake my laptop really hard, it looks through all my TCP buffers and kills any TCP connection that contains a buffer with the words "Microsoft" or "Apple" in it. You'd be amazed at how that impacts my productivity and personal satisfaction! Try doing that with a closed source operating system! ;)
Brandon L. Golm said…
last I checked mach was open source, and it wasn't all that hard to hack the vtables to inject any code you wanted into osx's darwin. :)

Fine you win ... shake your computer. Sounds like a great idea.
jjinux said…
Darwin *is* open source--"kinda". You just can't really do anything with it. I.e., you can't currently take it and build a complete operating system out of it, unless you're Apple.

Hmm, "Apple"...time to shake my computer some more!
Brandon L. Golm said…
Well I know we will never agree since our philosophies differ...

But saying you couldn't build an OS out of darwin is like saying you couldn't build one out of Linux. GNU seems to have pulled it off. Also, depends on what you mean by OS (let's not talk about chrome os).

And I don't want to build an OS, I want to use one and I accept that I'm never going to build one. I'm trying to get you to accept that for yourself too.

(for third-parties, JJ and I have this conversation every time we get together ... and it's friendly banter, which usually ends in haiku)
jjinux said…
I'm taking the haiku offline ;)
Brandon L. Golm said…
haiku on IM.
raining insults in real time
jj wins again

("raining" counts as my seasonal reference, since we're on a public forum, I have to try)
Johannes said…
Hey, thanks for the review!
A picture would male it even nicer!
jjinux said…
> A picture would male it even nicer!

You got it ;) Done.
jjinux said…
Hey, neat! I configured a headshot for myself under Account Information, and it showed up on my login screen like OS X :)

Popular posts from this blog

Ubuntu 20.04 on a 2015 15" MacBook Pro

I decided to give Ubuntu 20.04 a try on my 2015 15" MacBook Pro. I didn't actually install it; I just live booted from a USB thumb drive which was enough to try out everything I wanted. In summary, it's not perfect, and issues with my camera would prevent me from switching, but given the right hardware, I think it's a really viable option. The first thing I wanted to try was what would happen if I plugged in a non-HiDPI screen given that my laptop has a HiDPI screen. Without sub-pixel scaling, whatever scale rate I picked for one screen would apply to the other. However, once I turned on sub-pixel scaling, I was able to pick different scale rates for the internal and external displays. That looked ok. I tried plugging in and unplugging multiple times, and it didn't crash. I doubt it'd work with my Thunderbolt display at work, but it worked fine for my HDMI displays at home. I even plugged it into my TV, and it stuck to the 100% scaling I picked for the othe

ERNOS: Erlang Networked Operating System

I've been reading Dreaming in Code lately, and I really like it. If you're not a dreamer, you may safely skip the rest of this post ;) In Chapter 10, "Engineers and Artists", Alan Kay, John Backus, and Jaron Lanier really got me thinking. I've also been thinking a lot about Minix 3 , Erlang , and the original Lisp machine . The ideas are beginning to synthesize into something cohesive--more than just the sum of their parts. Now, I'm sure that many of these ideas have already been envisioned within , LLVM , Microsoft's Singularity project, or in some other place that I haven't managed to discover or fully read, but I'm going to blog them anyway. Rather than wax philosophical, let me just dump out some ideas: Start with Minix 3. It's a new microkernel, and it's meant for real use, unlike the original Minix. "This new OS is extremely small, with the part that runs in kernel mode under 4000 lines of executable code.&quo

Haskell or Erlang?

I've coded in both Erlang and Haskell. Erlang is practical, efficient, and useful. It's got a wonderful niche in the distributed world, and it has some real success stories such as CouchDB and Haskell is elegant and beautiful. It's been successful in various programming language competitions. I have some experience in both, but I'm thinking it's time to really commit to learning one of them on a professional level. They both have good books out now, and it's probably time I read one of those books cover to cover. My question is which? Back in 2000, Perl had established a real niche for systems administration, CGI, and text processing. The syntax wasn't exactly beautiful (unless you're into that sort of thing), but it was popular and mature. Python hadn't really become popular, nor did it really have a strong niche (at least as far as I could see). I went with Python because of its elegance, but since then, I've coded both p