Skip to main content

Rails: Engine Yard Flex


I'm reading the Engine Yard Flex documentation. It's pretty interesting. Here's a snippet:
Each Application or Application Master server is setup to run haproxy on port 80 and then nginx or apache on port 81. Each App server has its own haproxy setup to balance load to all the other App servers so any one App server could become master at any point if the main master fails for any reason. We have an 'ey-monitor' daemon that runs on all the application slave servers and periodically does health checks on the current Application Master server to see if it is still running properly or not. If the App Master fails for any reason then the App slaves will try to take over as master by using a technique called STONITH(shoot the other node in the head). This means that once the master fails, the slaves will wait for a few bad health checks and then the slaves will all race to grab a distributed lock. Whichever slave gets the lock will steal the IP address of the failing master server, then it will notify our control tier which in turn will violently terminate the failed app master. Then the system will boot a new server to replace the failed node and will use the same volumes that old master had so it has the full current state of the world.

This all happens transparently to you as a user and needs no input. The system will try its best to keep itself running and at the capacity that you have stated. There can be a very short downtime when slaves take over for masters, but generally it happens in 60 seconds or less.
Boy I'm glad I don't have to set all that stuff up myself!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ubuntu 20.04 on a 2015 15" MacBook Pro

I decided to give Ubuntu 20.04 a try on my 2015 15" MacBook Pro. I didn't actually install it; I just live booted from a USB thumb drive which was enough to try out everything I wanted. In summary, it's not perfect, and issues with my camera would prevent me from switching, but given the right hardware, I think it's a really viable option. The first thing I wanted to try was what would happen if I plugged in a non-HiDPI screen given that my laptop has a HiDPI screen. Without sub-pixel scaling, whatever scale rate I picked for one screen would apply to the other. However, once I turned on sub-pixel scaling, I was able to pick different scale rates for the internal and external displays. That looked ok. I tried plugging in and unplugging multiple times, and it didn't crash. I doubt it'd work with my Thunderbolt display at work, but it worked fine for my HDMI displays at home. I even plugged it into my TV, and it stuck to the 100% scaling I picked for the othe

ERNOS: Erlang Networked Operating System

I've been reading Dreaming in Code lately, and I really like it. If you're not a dreamer, you may safely skip the rest of this post ;) In Chapter 10, "Engineers and Artists", Alan Kay, John Backus, and Jaron Lanier really got me thinking. I've also been thinking a lot about Minix 3 , Erlang , and the original Lisp machine . The ideas are beginning to synthesize into something cohesive--more than just the sum of their parts. Now, I'm sure that many of these ideas have already been envisioned within Tunes.org , LLVM , Microsoft's Singularity project, or in some other place that I haven't managed to discover or fully read, but I'm going to blog them anyway. Rather than wax philosophical, let me just dump out some ideas: Start with Minix 3. It's a new microkernel, and it's meant for real use, unlike the original Minix. "This new OS is extremely small, with the part that runs in kernel mode under 4000 lines of executable code.&quo

Haskell or Erlang?

I've coded in both Erlang and Haskell. Erlang is practical, efficient, and useful. It's got a wonderful niche in the distributed world, and it has some real success stories such as CouchDB and jabber.org. Haskell is elegant and beautiful. It's been successful in various programming language competitions. I have some experience in both, but I'm thinking it's time to really commit to learning one of them on a professional level. They both have good books out now, and it's probably time I read one of those books cover to cover. My question is which? Back in 2000, Perl had established a real niche for systems administration, CGI, and text processing. The syntax wasn't exactly beautiful (unless you're into that sort of thing), but it was popular and mature. Python hadn't really become popular, nor did it really have a strong niche (at least as far as I could see). I went with Python because of its elegance, but since then, I've coded both p