Skip to main content

Rails: Cache Inconsistency Caused by a Common Rails Idiom

Rails has a feature called "flash". Anything put in the flash is available on the next page load. It's based on the session, but it goes away after the next page load. It's perfect for saving a message for the user even if you're going to do a redirect.

Rails also has a function called reset_session that wipes the user's session and gives him a new one. Agile Web Development with Rails says you should call the reset_session method after the user logs out of your site. This helps avoid session fixation attacks.

Unfortunately, authlogic doesn't do this automatically. Hence, I decided to do it myself. I had code like:
flash[:notice] = "Log out successful!"
The code works, but the message "Log out successful!" doesn't show up. Fortunately, my tests caught that. It turns out that Rails has a known bug that if you call reset_session, flash breaks. Why?

Rails uses an idiom that looks like:
def foo
@foo ||= calculate_foo
This idiom implicitly uses @foo as a cache so that calculate_foo is only called the first time the foo method is called.

The great thing about caches is that they can prevent unnecessary, time-consuming work. The bad thing about them is that you have to deal with cache inconsistency problems.

flash uses this idiom:
def flash
unless defined? @_flash
@_flash = session["flash"] ||=

So does the session. You might see where I'm going with this.

When you call reset_session, there are two caches that have become inconsistent, and the fact that there are multiple layers of cache inconsistency is what lead to the bug.


jjinux said…
I think reset_session is broken again. I just upgraded to Rails 2.3.8, and I'm getting test failures related to reset_session.

This may be related:

Popular posts from this blog

Ubuntu 20.04 on a 2015 15" MacBook Pro

I decided to give Ubuntu 20.04 a try on my 2015 15" MacBook Pro. I didn't actually install it; I just live booted from a USB thumb drive which was enough to try out everything I wanted. In summary, it's not perfect, and issues with my camera would prevent me from switching, but given the right hardware, I think it's a really viable option. The first thing I wanted to try was what would happen if I plugged in a non-HiDPI screen given that my laptop has a HiDPI screen. Without sub-pixel scaling, whatever scale rate I picked for one screen would apply to the other. However, once I turned on sub-pixel scaling, I was able to pick different scale rates for the internal and external displays. That looked ok. I tried plugging in and unplugging multiple times, and it didn't crash. I doubt it'd work with my Thunderbolt display at work, but it worked fine for my HDMI displays at home. I even plugged it into my TV, and it stuck to the 100% scaling I picked for the othe

ERNOS: Erlang Networked Operating System

I've been reading Dreaming in Code lately, and I really like it. If you're not a dreamer, you may safely skip the rest of this post ;) In Chapter 10, "Engineers and Artists", Alan Kay, John Backus, and Jaron Lanier really got me thinking. I've also been thinking a lot about Minix 3 , Erlang , and the original Lisp machine . The ideas are beginning to synthesize into something cohesive--more than just the sum of their parts. Now, I'm sure that many of these ideas have already been envisioned within , LLVM , Microsoft's Singularity project, or in some other place that I haven't managed to discover or fully read, but I'm going to blog them anyway. Rather than wax philosophical, let me just dump out some ideas: Start with Minix 3. It's a new microkernel, and it's meant for real use, unlike the original Minix. "This new OS is extremely small, with the part that runs in kernel mode under 4000 lines of executable code.&quo

Haskell or Erlang?

I've coded in both Erlang and Haskell. Erlang is practical, efficient, and useful. It's got a wonderful niche in the distributed world, and it has some real success stories such as CouchDB and Haskell is elegant and beautiful. It's been successful in various programming language competitions. I have some experience in both, but I'm thinking it's time to really commit to learning one of them on a professional level. They both have good books out now, and it's probably time I read one of those books cover to cover. My question is which? Back in 2000, Perl had established a real niche for systems administration, CGI, and text processing. The syntax wasn't exactly beautiful (unless you're into that sort of thing), but it was popular and mature. Python hadn't really become popular, nor did it really have a strong niche (at least as far as I could see). I went with Python because of its elegance, but since then, I've coded both p