Skip to main content

Apple: Broken Keyboard: Apple to the Rescue!

I left the gate to my office open, and when I went inside, I noticed my Return key on my MacBook was broken. I think my 1.5 year old got to it.

I read online that it's best to just bring it in to the Apple Store. It turned out that there was a small plastic part that was broken. They have a drawer full of keyboards which they use to replace broken keys. However, the Apple Store near my house didn't have the right keyboard.

I went to five Apple stores in all, and none of them had the right type of keyboard. Somehow, my 2008 MacBook is different than everyone else's. The person at the fifth store checked, and my warranty had expired just two weeks earlier.

The guy at the "Genius Bar" said, "I'm not going to petty. We'll fix it. We'll just replace the whole top case." The top case includes the touch pad, etc. and costs about $150. I gave him my laptop immediately, and picked it up four days later.

In the past (about five years ago), I had some really bad experiences with Apple support, but this experience was radically different in a whole range of ways. All I can say is:

Apple, thank you!


Steve said…
It's that kind of thinking (and behavior) that wins loyal customers. I'm sure if they'd forced you to pay for a replacement because your system was out of warranty you'd have been equally vociferous about it, and several non-Apple customers would have thought to themselves "right, won't go there, then".

I just can't figure out why excellent customer service is the exception rather than the norm. Probably because too many businesses are run by accountants with an eye only to this year's bottom line.
jjinux said…
Steve, I couldn't agree more.

Recently, my dad had a similarly positive experience with T-Mobile (i.e. one where they went way above and beyond what was required). This was a good counter to the negative experiences I've had with Sprint lately. Hence, I hope to buy a G1 and switch to T-Mobile in April.
Unknown said…
A very sensible 'genius' there!

The economic situation will pressure more companies into better service, as it's much cheaper to keep existing customers than to find new ones.

Those companies that treat their customers (their lifeblood after all) poorly will be more likely to go out of business. So, in the end, we should get better service overall - this logic is turned upside down with bailouts, moral hazard and the like, so we're in for an interesting time...
bushman said…
if it costed you a sweet $150 why shouldnt they give u the best of service. I was hoping u were sarcastic with ur post but it appears that you were actually satisfied by their service.
jjinux said…
bushman, perhaps I wasn't clear enough. He didn't charge me anything. He gave me the $150 top case for free.

Popular posts from this blog

Ubuntu 20.04 on a 2015 15" MacBook Pro

I decided to give Ubuntu 20.04 a try on my 2015 15" MacBook Pro. I didn't actually install it; I just live booted from a USB thumb drive which was enough to try out everything I wanted. In summary, it's not perfect, and issues with my camera would prevent me from switching, but given the right hardware, I think it's a really viable option. The first thing I wanted to try was what would happen if I plugged in a non-HiDPI screen given that my laptop has a HiDPI screen. Without sub-pixel scaling, whatever scale rate I picked for one screen would apply to the other. However, once I turned on sub-pixel scaling, I was able to pick different scale rates for the internal and external displays. That looked ok. I tried plugging in and unplugging multiple times, and it didn't crash. I doubt it'd work with my Thunderbolt display at work, but it worked fine for my HDMI displays at home. I even plugged it into my TV, and it stuck to the 100% scaling I picked for the othe

ERNOS: Erlang Networked Operating System

I've been reading Dreaming in Code lately, and I really like it. If you're not a dreamer, you may safely skip the rest of this post ;) In Chapter 10, "Engineers and Artists", Alan Kay, John Backus, and Jaron Lanier really got me thinking. I've also been thinking a lot about Minix 3 , Erlang , and the original Lisp machine . The ideas are beginning to synthesize into something cohesive--more than just the sum of their parts. Now, I'm sure that many of these ideas have already been envisioned within , LLVM , Microsoft's Singularity project, or in some other place that I haven't managed to discover or fully read, but I'm going to blog them anyway. Rather than wax philosophical, let me just dump out some ideas: Start with Minix 3. It's a new microkernel, and it's meant for real use, unlike the original Minix. "This new OS is extremely small, with the part that runs in kernel mode under 4000 lines of executable code.&quo

Haskell or Erlang?

I've coded in both Erlang and Haskell. Erlang is practical, efficient, and useful. It's got a wonderful niche in the distributed world, and it has some real success stories such as CouchDB and Haskell is elegant and beautiful. It's been successful in various programming language competitions. I have some experience in both, but I'm thinking it's time to really commit to learning one of them on a professional level. They both have good books out now, and it's probably time I read one of those books cover to cover. My question is which? Back in 2000, Perl had established a real niche for systems administration, CGI, and text processing. The syntax wasn't exactly beautiful (unless you're into that sort of thing), but it was popular and mature. Python hadn't really become popular, nor did it really have a strong niche (at least as far as I could see). I went with Python because of its elegance, but since then, I've coded both p