Skip to main content

Books: Ruby for Rails

I just finished a series of blog posts called Ruby: A Python Programmer's Perspective. Now, I'd like to finish up by writing a quick review of Ruby for Rails. Overall, it wasn't bad. If you can't tell by my other posts, I learned a lot. I really enjoyed the middle of the book which covered Ruby, but I got bored toward the end when the author spent three chapters improving an ecommerce site.

The author appears to be an intelligent, native English speaker, however his grammar patterns made it difficult for me to read the book quickly. Here is an example:
We must be able to determine before executing an action what state we're in with regard to the visitor's login status and its importance. [p. 440]
Translation: "Don't show the login form if the user is already logged in."

Here's another example:
Facility with Ruby will stand you in good stead in your controller programming, as well as your model programming. [p. 438]
Translation: "If you don't know Ruby, you're going to have a hard time writing controllers and models." Note, this sentence is in chapter 16. I would argue that anyone who has made it to chapter 16 knows that you need to know Ruby to be proficient with Rails ;)

By and large, the code was pretty good. However, there were a few times when I was pulling my hair out. Here's an example:
def Work.all_periods
find(:all).map {|c| c.period }.flatten.uniq.sort
end
This ActiveRecord code pulls down every musical Work in the entire database in order to get a list of the 5 or so musical periods. I know that people love to say that Rails doesn't scale. Given this example, I'd have to agree. I would have preferred to see the code that makes the database do the hard work instead of downloading the entire table to the application server.

One thing I will say about this book is that a lot of people have read it. I like to submit errata to authors. If I find a technical error in a book, it's a good sign that I'm paying attention, so I try to find as many errors as possible. When I went to submit errata for this book, about half of the errors I found had already been submitted by other readers. That was pretty impressive.

In summary, if you need to learn Ruby in order to use Rails, this book is worth reading.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ubuntu 20.04 on a 2015 15" MacBook Pro

I decided to give Ubuntu 20.04 a try on my 2015 15" MacBook Pro. I didn't actually install it; I just live booted from a USB thumb drive which was enough to try out everything I wanted. In summary, it's not perfect, and issues with my camera would prevent me from switching, but given the right hardware, I think it's a really viable option. The first thing I wanted to try was what would happen if I plugged in a non-HiDPI screen given that my laptop has a HiDPI screen. Without sub-pixel scaling, whatever scale rate I picked for one screen would apply to the other. However, once I turned on sub-pixel scaling, I was able to pick different scale rates for the internal and external displays. That looked ok. I tried plugging in and unplugging multiple times, and it didn't crash. I doubt it'd work with my Thunderbolt display at work, but it worked fine for my HDMI displays at home. I even plugged it into my TV, and it stuck to the 100% scaling I picked for the othe

ERNOS: Erlang Networked Operating System

I've been reading Dreaming in Code lately, and I really like it. If you're not a dreamer, you may safely skip the rest of this post ;) In Chapter 10, "Engineers and Artists", Alan Kay, John Backus, and Jaron Lanier really got me thinking. I've also been thinking a lot about Minix 3 , Erlang , and the original Lisp machine . The ideas are beginning to synthesize into something cohesive--more than just the sum of their parts. Now, I'm sure that many of these ideas have already been envisioned within Tunes.org , LLVM , Microsoft's Singularity project, or in some other place that I haven't managed to discover or fully read, but I'm going to blog them anyway. Rather than wax philosophical, let me just dump out some ideas: Start with Minix 3. It's a new microkernel, and it's meant for real use, unlike the original Minix. "This new OS is extremely small, with the part that runs in kernel mode under 4000 lines of executable code.&quo

Haskell or Erlang?

I've coded in both Erlang and Haskell. Erlang is practical, efficient, and useful. It's got a wonderful niche in the distributed world, and it has some real success stories such as CouchDB and jabber.org. Haskell is elegant and beautiful. It's been successful in various programming language competitions. I have some experience in both, but I'm thinking it's time to really commit to learning one of them on a professional level. They both have good books out now, and it's probably time I read one of those books cover to cover. My question is which? Back in 2000, Perl had established a real niche for systems administration, CGI, and text processing. The syntax wasn't exactly beautiful (unless you're into that sort of thing), but it was popular and mature. Python hadn't really become popular, nor did it really have a strong niche (at least as far as I could see). I went with Python because of its elegance, but since then, I've coded both p