Skip to main content

Web: SilverStripe

A couple years ago, I built my church's website using Plone. I had to read most of "The Definitive Guide to Plone", but I did it and it worked.

Recently, I realized it was time to overhaul the website. My buddy is a Plone expert, and he told me I would have an easier time rebuilding the website than trying to migrate it since my version of Plone is so old. After two years, I had forgotten much of what I knew about Plone, and I knew that my book was out of date.

I went looking for something that didn't have quite the same learning curve. Plone is fantastic if you're a Plone expert, but I'm not. I just needed "an overly simplistic content management system." I tried out Drupal and Joomla, but for long and complicated reasons, some of which involved my ISP, I decided against them; I'm sure they're quite nice.

My buddy Leon Atkinson told me that he had seen a cool demo for SilverStripe. SilverStripe is PHP, but I decided to watch the video anyway. I was amazed. It's worth the five minutes it takes to watch the screencast.

I decided to actually try it out. Within three hours, I had installed it, read one page of the tutorial, and actually built out a decent portion of the website.

What I like about SilverStripe is that it's super simple. It uses TinyMCE, so you can get a lot done with just a WYSIWYG editor. However, it also encourages you to dip into flat files in the filesystem to edit templates. It's like the best of both worlds for me. I'm almost done with the website, and I still haven't actually had to code any PHP yet. TinyMCE is occasionally a bit fickle and I've seen weird caching problems, but overall, I'm really happy.

Permit me to wax philosophic. For a hundred different reasons, I prefer Python over PHP. However, there's no denying that there's a ton of really good projects written in PHP. Consider php forum, MediaWiki, WordPress, Flickr, etc.

I have a pet theory about why this is so. I care an awful lot about how I build something, but I don't care much at all about what I build. Hence, I can use Python to build whatever, and I'm happy. Seriously, I know a ton of stuff, and I write beautiful code, but I never have any interesting ideas about what to code ;)

Most people aren't like me. For them, a programming language is just a tool to build something they want. They don't care how it gets coded as long as it does get coded. Product people often build beautiful things using not-so-beautiful code. I'm not saying that PHP can't be beautiful. I'm just saying that sometimes it doesn't matter.

Perhaps I'm just feeling a bit bipolar.


Anonymous said…
I totally understand about the "how" versus the "just doing".

Thanks for sharing about the framework. It looks like it might fill a need for one of my customers as well.
Anonymous said…
I believe the real reason PHP is used so much is that it's basically only an Apache module that is supported by nearly every provider.

Another CMS playing in the same league as SilverStripe is
Ruben said…
I am actually having the same issue about CMS and Python.
For a new project I decided to make it with Plone. In May, I bought the book Professional Plone Development from Martin Aspeli. An excellent book, but it demonstrated so painfully that developing with Plone is a nightmare for those who don't do it 24 hours a day 7 days a week. The book gave me a lot of insight what is good and bad about Plone.

Mid July I decided to change strategy and look for other options. I looked at PHP CMS, but eventually I decided to
write my one simple CMS using Pylons, removing all the bad things of Plone but taking over the good aspects. By the end of septemeber I should a first version available.
jjinux said…
I find that *very* interesting, since I already use Pylons. Best of luck with that. I really hope you can achieve the ease of use of WordPress and SilverStripe. It's something that Python desperately needs.

Popular posts from this blog

Ubuntu 20.04 on a 2015 15" MacBook Pro

I decided to give Ubuntu 20.04 a try on my 2015 15" MacBook Pro. I didn't actually install it; I just live booted from a USB thumb drive which was enough to try out everything I wanted. In summary, it's not perfect, and issues with my camera would prevent me from switching, but given the right hardware, I think it's a really viable option. The first thing I wanted to try was what would happen if I plugged in a non-HiDPI screen given that my laptop has a HiDPI screen. Without sub-pixel scaling, whatever scale rate I picked for one screen would apply to the other. However, once I turned on sub-pixel scaling, I was able to pick different scale rates for the internal and external displays. That looked ok. I tried plugging in and unplugging multiple times, and it didn't crash. I doubt it'd work with my Thunderbolt display at work, but it worked fine for my HDMI displays at home. I even plugged it into my TV, and it stuck to the 100% scaling I picked for the othe

ERNOS: Erlang Networked Operating System

I've been reading Dreaming in Code lately, and I really like it. If you're not a dreamer, you may safely skip the rest of this post ;) In Chapter 10, "Engineers and Artists", Alan Kay, John Backus, and Jaron Lanier really got me thinking. I've also been thinking a lot about Minix 3 , Erlang , and the original Lisp machine . The ideas are beginning to synthesize into something cohesive--more than just the sum of their parts. Now, I'm sure that many of these ideas have already been envisioned within , LLVM , Microsoft's Singularity project, or in some other place that I haven't managed to discover or fully read, but I'm going to blog them anyway. Rather than wax philosophical, let me just dump out some ideas: Start with Minix 3. It's a new microkernel, and it's meant for real use, unlike the original Minix. "This new OS is extremely small, with the part that runs in kernel mode under 4000 lines of executable code.&quo

Haskell or Erlang?

I've coded in both Erlang and Haskell. Erlang is practical, efficient, and useful. It's got a wonderful niche in the distributed world, and it has some real success stories such as CouchDB and Haskell is elegant and beautiful. It's been successful in various programming language competitions. I have some experience in both, but I'm thinking it's time to really commit to learning one of them on a professional level. They both have good books out now, and it's probably time I read one of those books cover to cover. My question is which? Back in 2000, Perl had established a real niche for systems administration, CGI, and text processing. The syntax wasn't exactly beautiful (unless you're into that sort of thing), but it was popular and mature. Python hadn't really become popular, nor did it really have a strong niche (at least as far as I could see). I went with Python because of its elegance, but since then, I've coded both p