Skip to main content

Books: Basics of Compiler Design

I started reading Basics of Compiler Design. I think, perhaps, it might have helped if I had actually taken the course rather than simply try to read the book.

Here's a simple rule of thumb:
Never use three pages of complicated mathematics to explain that which can be explained using either a simple picture or a short snippet of pseudo code.
The section on "Converting an NFA to a DFA" had me at the point of tears. After a couple hours, I finally understood it. However, even after I understood it, I knew I could do a better job teaching it. A little bit of Scheme written by the SICP guys would have been infinitely clearer.

I hate to be harsh, but it seemed like the author was just having a good time playing with TeX. I picked this book because it was short and didn't dive into code too much. What I found is that it uses math instead of code. I'd prefer code.

The worst part of reading this book by myself is that even if I make it to the end, I won't know if I truly mastered the material because I won't have a compiler to show for my work. After all, there's no one around to grade my written assignments, and the book doesn't actually take you all the way through writing a real compiler.

Comments

Sunny said…
Have you read the Dragon Book(I forgot what the actual title is). I think it's the best book on Compiler design.
jjinux said…
Yeah, I have a copy. I drowned in it a few years back. I don't know why, but I can inhale books from O'Reilly with no problem, but I totally drown in books like the Dragon book. I think it has to do with lack of time, sleep, etc. The only time I have to try to conquer such books is late at night, and I never have enough mental energy to succeed.

Popular posts from this blog

Ubuntu 20.04 on a 2015 15" MacBook Pro

I decided to give Ubuntu 20.04 a try on my 2015 15" MacBook Pro. I didn't actually install it; I just live booted from a USB thumb drive which was enough to try out everything I wanted. In summary, it's not perfect, and issues with my camera would prevent me from switching, but given the right hardware, I think it's a really viable option. The first thing I wanted to try was what would happen if I plugged in a non-HiDPI screen given that my laptop has a HiDPI screen. Without sub-pixel scaling, whatever scale rate I picked for one screen would apply to the other. However, once I turned on sub-pixel scaling, I was able to pick different scale rates for the internal and external displays. That looked ok. I tried plugging in and unplugging multiple times, and it didn't crash. I doubt it'd work with my Thunderbolt display at work, but it worked fine for my HDMI displays at home. I even plugged it into my TV, and it stuck to the 100% scaling I picked for the othe

ERNOS: Erlang Networked Operating System

I've been reading Dreaming in Code lately, and I really like it. If you're not a dreamer, you may safely skip the rest of this post ;) In Chapter 10, "Engineers and Artists", Alan Kay, John Backus, and Jaron Lanier really got me thinking. I've also been thinking a lot about Minix 3 , Erlang , and the original Lisp machine . The ideas are beginning to synthesize into something cohesive--more than just the sum of their parts. Now, I'm sure that many of these ideas have already been envisioned within Tunes.org , LLVM , Microsoft's Singularity project, or in some other place that I haven't managed to discover or fully read, but I'm going to blog them anyway. Rather than wax philosophical, let me just dump out some ideas: Start with Minix 3. It's a new microkernel, and it's meant for real use, unlike the original Minix. "This new OS is extremely small, with the part that runs in kernel mode under 4000 lines of executable code.&quo

Haskell or Erlang?

I've coded in both Erlang and Haskell. Erlang is practical, efficient, and useful. It's got a wonderful niche in the distributed world, and it has some real success stories such as CouchDB and jabber.org. Haskell is elegant and beautiful. It's been successful in various programming language competitions. I have some experience in both, but I'm thinking it's time to really commit to learning one of them on a professional level. They both have good books out now, and it's probably time I read one of those books cover to cover. My question is which? Back in 2000, Perl had established a real niche for systems administration, CGI, and text processing. The syntax wasn't exactly beautiful (unless you're into that sort of thing), but it was popular and mature. Python hadn't really become popular, nor did it really have a strong niche (at least as far as I could see). I went with Python because of its elegance, but since then, I've coded both p