Skip to main content

Lisp: Pattern Matching

As I mentioned earlier, I'm making my way through the SICP lectures.

Today, I'm excited about pattern matching. For instance, consider this:
(define deriv-rules
'(
...
( (dd (+ (? x1) (? x2)) (? v))
(+ (dd (: x1) (: v))
(dd (: x2) (: v))) )
...))
It says that the derivative of x1 + x2 with respect to v is the derivative of x1 with respect to v + the derivative of x2 with respect to v. Notice, it's all data. "No 'if' statements were harmed in the making of this film" ;)

I've played around with Haskell, Ocaml, and Erlang, so I'm familiar with match
statements. They make sense. However, I had never seen someone implement such a system, especially in such an elegant manner.

I'm so used to coding like "if this, then do this". Pattern recognition is all about "if the data matches this pattern, fill in this skeleton and then start over." I feel like I've just been "meta'd".

I've been thinking about how I might apply these things to C. A closure is a struct with a function pointer and a void * to hold some data. A continuation is a stack (perhaps an array) of closures. I would have never thought to code that way in C. However, now that I've seen it in Lisp, it just makes sense.

Of course, major props go to the graph database team at Metaweb. They actually *do* code that way in C, and the coder who started that code base is a woman ;)

The last thing I'd like to say is that it's funny watching the professors teach. They're so confident. They say things like "it's very simple" all the time. That's because they have the material mastered. They know where they're going. Researching is quite the opposite. You don't know where you're going. You don't know if there even is an answer. You're often wrong. It's a lot of fumbling around hoping something's going to work. Since MIT professors spend so much time both teaching and researching, it would seem they must have a bit of a split personality.

As a last statement, I don't know how those students survive without pause and rewind! Seriously, it takes me at least two hours to watch a one hour lecture! Watch, pause, think. Rinse and repeat.

Comments

binary boi said…
Is pattern matching the same as macros?
jjinux said…
No, but macros can use pattern matching.

Popular posts from this blog

Ubuntu 20.04 on a 2015 15" MacBook Pro

I decided to give Ubuntu 20.04 a try on my 2015 15" MacBook Pro. I didn't actually install it; I just live booted from a USB thumb drive which was enough to try out everything I wanted. In summary, it's not perfect, and issues with my camera would prevent me from switching, but given the right hardware, I think it's a really viable option. The first thing I wanted to try was what would happen if I plugged in a non-HiDPI screen given that my laptop has a HiDPI screen. Without sub-pixel scaling, whatever scale rate I picked for one screen would apply to the other. However, once I turned on sub-pixel scaling, I was able to pick different scale rates for the internal and external displays. That looked ok. I tried plugging in and unplugging multiple times, and it didn't crash. I doubt it'd work with my Thunderbolt display at work, but it worked fine for my HDMI displays at home. I even plugged it into my TV, and it stuck to the 100% scaling I picked for the othe

ERNOS: Erlang Networked Operating System

I've been reading Dreaming in Code lately, and I really like it. If you're not a dreamer, you may safely skip the rest of this post ;) In Chapter 10, "Engineers and Artists", Alan Kay, John Backus, and Jaron Lanier really got me thinking. I've also been thinking a lot about Minix 3 , Erlang , and the original Lisp machine . The ideas are beginning to synthesize into something cohesive--more than just the sum of their parts. Now, I'm sure that many of these ideas have already been envisioned within Tunes.org , LLVM , Microsoft's Singularity project, or in some other place that I haven't managed to discover or fully read, but I'm going to blog them anyway. Rather than wax philosophical, let me just dump out some ideas: Start with Minix 3. It's a new microkernel, and it's meant for real use, unlike the original Minix. "This new OS is extremely small, with the part that runs in kernel mode under 4000 lines of executable code.&quo

Haskell or Erlang?

I've coded in both Erlang and Haskell. Erlang is practical, efficient, and useful. It's got a wonderful niche in the distributed world, and it has some real success stories such as CouchDB and jabber.org. Haskell is elegant and beautiful. It's been successful in various programming language competitions. I have some experience in both, but I'm thinking it's time to really commit to learning one of them on a professional level. They both have good books out now, and it's probably time I read one of those books cover to cover. My question is which? Back in 2000, Perl had established a real niche for systems administration, CGI, and text processing. The syntax wasn't exactly beautiful (unless you're into that sort of thing), but it was popular and mature. Python hadn't really become popular, nor did it really have a strong niche (at least as far as I could see). I went with Python because of its elegance, but since then, I've coded both p