Skip to main content

Linux: Resetting GNOME Settings

My mother-in-law uses Linux, but she's far from the most savvy computer user in the world. It's tough when you start using Linux in your seventies ;) Anyway, somehow she occasionally deletes her GNOME panel. That's a problem because it prevents her from starting any applications. After much practice, I've narrowed down the list of steps that are the easiest to dictate over the phone:
  1. Restart the computer.
  2. Don't log in. Rather, hit Cntl-Alt-F1 in order to get to a text-based login screen.
  3. Now log in.
  4. Type "rm -rf .gnome* .gconf*".
  5. Now, hit Cntl-Alt-Delete.
  6. Let it reboot and then log in normally. Things should be fixed.
Note that this will wipe all of your GNOME settings. However, since it's easy to type, and she doesn't have any settings anyway, it's perfect. The reason I do this delicate dance of rebooting is to prevent gconfd from doing things behind my back.
Labels:

Comments

Ben Bangert said…
Amusing to think of what would happen if she should accidentally put a space before either of the * so that its:

Type "rm -rf .gnome * .gconf*".

I assume she has of course backed up her home dir frequently? :)
2:07 PM
Steve said…
Why not just alter the startup files to do step 4 every reboot? Then she could just reboot the machine without even calling ... or isn't that geeky enough? :)
2:09 PM
jjinux said…
> Type "rm -rf .gnome * .gconf*".

Yeah, I thought of that too. That's why I made her read the command back to me ;)

> Why not just alter the startup files to do step 4 every reboot?

Interesting idea.
2:22 PM
Unknown said…
In the schools I support, we do step 4 as a shell script called by Reset.desktop in:
/etc/X11/dm/Sessions

You can log out, select session type "Reset my desktop", and log in.
4:47 PM
schmichael said…
@dan young:

Thats a great idea.

Honestly Gnome really should come bundled with a reset key-combo because I've known even computer savvy people who get into this tough spot. I can walk them through booting into the console to fix it, but its very frustrating for them.

A Ctrl-Alt-Esc Esc or something that displays a "Do you want to reset your Gnome Settings and reboot?" would be perfect.
8:00 PM
Anonymous said…
I just tried deleting my gnome panels after reading this and the 'delete' option when I right click is disabled on the last panel. (Gnome 2.22.1 on Ubuntu 8.04).
1:22 AM
jjinux said…
Dan, I agree, that's a great idea.

By the way, I don't think she deleted all her panels, just the one with the menu bar.
12:12 PM
Anonymous said…
In your last command you could save some time by hitting ctrl alt <--

also there are some xml files in those directories that describe the configuration of those panels. Why not just remove write permissions from those panels to make it so she can't remove them on accident.
4:19 PM
jjinux said…
> In your last command you could save some time by hitting ctrl alt <--

Probably. I was really worried about gconfd hanging around even beyond X restarts.

> also there are some xml files in those directories that describe the configuration of those panels. Why not just remove write permissions from those panels to make it so she can't remove them on accident.

Good idea.
4:22 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ubuntu 20.04 on a 2015 15" MacBook Pro

I decided to give Ubuntu 20.04 a try on my 2015 15" MacBook Pro. I didn't actually install it; I just live booted from a USB thumb drive which was enough to try out everything I wanted. In summary, it's not perfect, and issues with my camera would prevent me from switching, but given the right hardware, I think it's a really viable option. The first thing I wanted to try was what would happen if I plugged in a non-HiDPI screen given that my laptop has a HiDPI screen. Without sub-pixel scaling, whatever scale rate I picked for one screen would apply to the other. However, once I turned on sub-pixel scaling, I was able to pick different scale rates for the internal and external displays. That looked ok. I tried plugging in and unplugging multiple times, and it didn't crash. I doubt it'd work with my Thunderbolt display at work, but it worked fine for my HDMI displays at home. I even plugged it into my TV, and it stuck to the 100% scaling I picked for the othe
1 comment
Read more

ERNOS: Erlang Networked Operating System

I've been reading Dreaming in Code lately, and I really like it. If you're not a dreamer, you may safely skip the rest of this post ;) In Chapter 10, "Engineers and Artists", Alan Kay, John Backus, and Jaron Lanier really got me thinking. I've also been thinking a lot about Minix 3 , Erlang , and the original Lisp machine . The ideas are beginning to synthesize into something cohesive--more than just the sum of their parts. Now, I'm sure that many of these ideas have already been envisioned within Tunes.org , LLVM , Microsoft's Singularity project, or in some other place that I haven't managed to discover or fully read, but I'm going to blog them anyway. Rather than wax philosophical, let me just dump out some ideas: Start with Minix 3. It's a new microkernel, and it's meant for real use, unlike the original Minix. "This new OS is extremely small, with the part that runs in kernel mode under 4000 lines of executable code.&quo
50 comments
Read more

Haskell or Erlang?

I've coded in both Erlang and Haskell. Erlang is practical, efficient, and useful. It's got a wonderful niche in the distributed world, and it has some real success stories such as CouchDB and jabber.org. Haskell is elegant and beautiful. It's been successful in various programming language competitions. I have some experience in both, but I'm thinking it's time to really commit to learning one of them on a professional level. They both have good books out now, and it's probably time I read one of those books cover to cover. My question is which? Back in 2000, Perl had established a real niche for systems administration, CGI, and text processing. The syntax wasn't exactly beautiful (unless you're into that sort of thing), but it was popular and mature. Python hadn't really become popular, nor did it really have a strong niche (at least as far as I could see). I went with Python because of its elegance, but since then, I've coded both p
66 comments
Read more