Skip to main content

PyCon: SQLAlchemy 0.4 and Beyond

SQLAlchemy 0.4 and Beyond

This was a whirlwind talk by Mike Bayer that covered both the past and the future of features in SQLAlchemy. It was good, but I'd need about three times as much time in order to understand it all.

0.1 was released in 2006.

0.4 will be faster and have better, smarter support for transactions.

SQLAlchemy now has crazy SQL generators for all sorts of weird situations. Inheritance is the least of these. There are tons of weird tricks that SQLAlchemy can automate for you.

SQLAlchemy now has a new "declarative" layer. You can use it if you don't want to go as far as Elixir goes. It's pretty simple. I think it's only 90 lines of code, or something like that. It unifies the tables and the classes.

SQLAlchemy provides lots and lots of abstraction. For me, at least, it's helpful to step back and look at what the SQL is really doing.

SQLAlchemy now has support for transaction sessions and transaction nesting (i.e. savepoints). However, it doesn't know how to rollback in-memory object state yet.

It also has support for two-phase commits. Use this if you need to commit a transaction to multiple databases.

It has support for lots of databases.

It now has some horizontal sharding support, modeled after Hibernate.

Support for migrating your database schema using Python syntax is now back.

There are multiple SQLAlchemy books on the way.

Comments

mike bayer said…
I didn't think the SQL examples in the talk were particularly crazy. I went through them too quick in the talk for sure but at the end of the day every example was pretty much joining two or three tables together on their foreign keys and adding some criterion.
jjinux said…
I'm sure you're right. I just can't read that fast.

I'm just emphasizing that SQLAlchemy has become pretty sophisticated.

Popular posts from this blog

Ubuntu 20.04 on a 2015 15" MacBook Pro

I decided to give Ubuntu 20.04 a try on my 2015 15" MacBook Pro. I didn't actually install it; I just live booted from a USB thumb drive which was enough to try out everything I wanted. In summary, it's not perfect, and issues with my camera would prevent me from switching, but given the right hardware, I think it's a really viable option. The first thing I wanted to try was what would happen if I plugged in a non-HiDPI screen given that my laptop has a HiDPI screen. Without sub-pixel scaling, whatever scale rate I picked for one screen would apply to the other. However, once I turned on sub-pixel scaling, I was able to pick different scale rates for the internal and external displays. That looked ok. I tried plugging in and unplugging multiple times, and it didn't crash. I doubt it'd work with my Thunderbolt display at work, but it worked fine for my HDMI displays at home. I even plugged it into my TV, and it stuck to the 100% scaling I picked for the othe

ERNOS: Erlang Networked Operating System

I've been reading Dreaming in Code lately, and I really like it. If you're not a dreamer, you may safely skip the rest of this post ;) In Chapter 10, "Engineers and Artists", Alan Kay, John Backus, and Jaron Lanier really got me thinking. I've also been thinking a lot about Minix 3 , Erlang , and the original Lisp machine . The ideas are beginning to synthesize into something cohesive--more than just the sum of their parts. Now, I'm sure that many of these ideas have already been envisioned within Tunes.org , LLVM , Microsoft's Singularity project, or in some other place that I haven't managed to discover or fully read, but I'm going to blog them anyway. Rather than wax philosophical, let me just dump out some ideas: Start with Minix 3. It's a new microkernel, and it's meant for real use, unlike the original Minix. "This new OS is extremely small, with the part that runs in kernel mode under 4000 lines of executable code.&quo

Haskell or Erlang?

I've coded in both Erlang and Haskell. Erlang is practical, efficient, and useful. It's got a wonderful niche in the distributed world, and it has some real success stories such as CouchDB and jabber.org. Haskell is elegant and beautiful. It's been successful in various programming language competitions. I have some experience in both, but I'm thinking it's time to really commit to learning one of them on a professional level. They both have good books out now, and it's probably time I read one of those books cover to cover. My question is which? Back in 2000, Perl had established a real niche for systems administration, CGI, and text processing. The syntax wasn't exactly beautiful (unless you're into that sort of thing), but it was popular and mature. Python hadn't really become popular, nor did it really have a strong niche (at least as far as I could see). I went with Python because of its elegance, but since then, I've coded both p