Skip to main content

Operating Systems: OpenDarwin Shutting Down

I totally missed this: OpenDarwin is shutting down:
OpenDarwin has failed to achieve its goals in 4 years of operation, and moves further from achieving these goals as time goes on...The original notions of developing the Mac OS X and Darwin sources has not panned out. Availability of sources, interaction with Apple representatives, difficulty building and tracking sources, and a lack of interest from the community have all contributed to this.
I can't say I'm surprised. When it comes to playing fair in the open source world, I simply trust the Linux guys more than I trust Apple. Besides, Darwin isn't even the most interesting thing about OS X--Cocoa is. Tragically, it's closed source.

As you all know, I've been pondering operating systems lately. I just don't think people are going to tolerate Apple's walled garden / vendor lock-in forever. I don't get the sense that Vista is a huge success. Based on my attendance at Linux Expo for the last seven years in a row, Linux seems to be somewhat quiet these days, at least on the desktop side. It makes me wonder what's going to happen on the desktop.

Maybe the desktop is dead--killed by the Web and Google. Maybe the desktop is going to be reborn via the likes of Adobe Air. I sure hope not. I don't need any more proprietary systems from Adobe! Maybe the desktop and the world-wide Web are both less important these days now that Facebook is functioning as a social operating system.

I don't know, but I do think there is some room for innovation.

Comments

jjinux said…
Ok, I've thought about it a little more. What would I like to see? Now that Second Life is becoming an open platform where everyone can run their own servers and there's an open source client, I want to see Second Life win as the next UI platform. I'm not so sure I want to be word processing documents in Second Life, but in some sense, I'd like to see it succeed as the next great platform.
Anonymous said…
> Linux seems to be somewhat quiet
> these days, at least on the
> desktop side.

Would you say KDE4 is "quiet" ?
Jesse said…
http://www.macosforge.org/

Apple is less of a walled garden then it typically appears. A lot of the DRM/Proprietary/iPhone esque lock in is a thin veneer of control, frequently - as seen with the apple tv, Apple looks the other way.

Darwin is still open source, and I can still run open source applications - linux/unix applications on the platform (OS/X) I run.
Anonymous said…
The announcment is from July of 2006. It was well known at the time amongst the very small group of people who were paying attention to Darwin. The OpenDarwin group were trying to expand Darwin past its very limited user base, but couldn't find sufficient interest amongst developers to continue. No big deal.
mikeal said…
The day OpenDarwin shut down apple brought up MacOSForge.

Instead of having a group the "plays nice with the community" MacOSForge just gives a place for all the open source work being lead by apple to happen in the open and they leave it to those groups to engage the community and outside developers on their own. It's actually a much better system.

The Apple Calendar Server and WebKit have a better list of outside contributions right now than Thunderbird does. And in terms of ease of development by outside developers, I would say WebKit is a more straightforward and easy to dig in to that the Firefox core.

Every time a company dedicates a group to be their "open source" group it inevitably goes sour. Their job is basically to make open source work for their company and rarely the other way around. But just having a policy for a product to be built in the open and allowing the engineering to manage the community themselves is much better. Engineers just want to make a cool product and tend to work better with the community because they have a common goal.
jjinux said…
> Would you say KDE4 is "quiet" ?

Maybe I live in a box, but I haven't heard anything about it lately. I would be trilled in KDE konquered the world ;)
jjinux said…
Jesse,

Thanks for your comments. Don't mind me if I play devil's advocate a little:

> http://www.macosforge.org/

Oh, thanks for that. Still, that looks more like a Sourceforge than a Debian, if that makes any sense.

> Apple looks the other way.

Yeah, but that's not a way to encourage an active community. "Prison's a lot of fun because you can goof off when the prison guard isn't looking!"

> Darwin is still open source,

Yeah, but what good is a kernel that you can't really use because you lack necessary drivers for your Apple hardware?

> I can still run open source applications

That's true of Windows too ;)
jjinux said…
Mikeal, great comments. Thanks.
Unknown said…
Air isn't proprietary. It's html, javascript and CSS based on top of Eclipse. Air is one of the cooler things I have seen in a long time, especially if you need to compile down to a 'native' app.
jjinux said…
Air is built on Flash and Flex:

http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/air/develop_flex.html

Popular posts from this blog

Ubuntu 20.04 on a 2015 15" MacBook Pro

I decided to give Ubuntu 20.04 a try on my 2015 15" MacBook Pro. I didn't actually install it; I just live booted from a USB thumb drive which was enough to try out everything I wanted. In summary, it's not perfect, and issues with my camera would prevent me from switching, but given the right hardware, I think it's a really viable option. The first thing I wanted to try was what would happen if I plugged in a non-HiDPI screen given that my laptop has a HiDPI screen. Without sub-pixel scaling, whatever scale rate I picked for one screen would apply to the other. However, once I turned on sub-pixel scaling, I was able to pick different scale rates for the internal and external displays. That looked ok. I tried plugging in and unplugging multiple times, and it didn't crash. I doubt it'd work with my Thunderbolt display at work, but it worked fine for my HDMI displays at home. I even plugged it into my TV, and it stuck to the 100% scaling I picked for the othe

ERNOS: Erlang Networked Operating System

I've been reading Dreaming in Code lately, and I really like it. If you're not a dreamer, you may safely skip the rest of this post ;) In Chapter 10, "Engineers and Artists", Alan Kay, John Backus, and Jaron Lanier really got me thinking. I've also been thinking a lot about Minix 3 , Erlang , and the original Lisp machine . The ideas are beginning to synthesize into something cohesive--more than just the sum of their parts. Now, I'm sure that many of these ideas have already been envisioned within Tunes.org , LLVM , Microsoft's Singularity project, or in some other place that I haven't managed to discover or fully read, but I'm going to blog them anyway. Rather than wax philosophical, let me just dump out some ideas: Start with Minix 3. It's a new microkernel, and it's meant for real use, unlike the original Minix. "This new OS is extremely small, with the part that runs in kernel mode under 4000 lines of executable code.&quo

Haskell or Erlang?

I've coded in both Erlang and Haskell. Erlang is practical, efficient, and useful. It's got a wonderful niche in the distributed world, and it has some real success stories such as CouchDB and jabber.org. Haskell is elegant and beautiful. It's been successful in various programming language competitions. I have some experience in both, but I'm thinking it's time to really commit to learning one of them on a professional level. They both have good books out now, and it's probably time I read one of those books cover to cover. My question is which? Back in 2000, Perl had established a real niche for systems administration, CGI, and text processing. The syntax wasn't exactly beautiful (unless you're into that sort of thing), but it was popular and mature. Python hadn't really become popular, nor did it really have a strong niche (at least as far as I could see). I went with Python because of its elegance, but since then, I've coded both p