Skip to main content

PyCon: Testing Tools in Python

I went to a two hour tutorial on testing. It was everything I hoped for. It was given by Grig Gheorghiu and Dr. C. Titus Brown. Here's an outline:
  • Unit tests:
    • Make sure your code works in isolation.
    • It's not a full code path.
    • He's purposely ignoring unit tests.
    • He encourages the confusion between unit tests and functional tests.
  • Functional tests:
    • Make sure your code works properly.
    • Use mock or live resources.
  • GUI tests:
    • Use a tool to record your interactions with an app and then play it back.
    • These are fragile.
  • Regression tests:
    • Making sure things don't get worse.
  • Acceptance tests:
    • "Unit tests ensure that you write the code right.
    • Acceptances tests ensure that you write the right code."
  • Mock testing:
    • Use "fake" resources so as to test your code with fewer dependencies.
    • Use mocking at the I/O boundaries.
  • nose:
    • You don't need to use the unittest API.
    • It's trivial. Write a module with a test_foo function. Run nose.
    • Unifies all the different test APIs.
    • Supports test fixtures via setup and teardown functions.
    • To test multiple apps: nosetests -w package0 -w package1 ...
    • If you have a lot of code, he recommends using nose from a Python script, not from the CLI.
    • The plugins are great.
  • Selenium:
    • This is GUI testing.
    • Test your AJAX.
    • Limited to a single Web site.
    • Really slick way to run tests in your browser.
    • You can script tests in Python.
    • Writing the scripts can be tedious, and they are fragile.
    • Useable for cross browser testing: Firefox, IE, Safari, Opera, etc.
    • Avoid it unless you're using AJAX.
  • My question: my tests pass, but I get bugs for cases I didn't consider:
    • You'll never:
      • Have complete code coverage.
      • Have tests for every situation.
      • Get away from the need for exploratory testing.
    • Automated tests free you up to do more exploratory testing.
    • When you find a bug, write test cases to try to flush out nearby bugs.
  • twill:
    • Speaker wrote it, and he likes it.
    • It's just a simple layer on top of other libraries.
    • Code in Python or "twill script".
    • In a sense, it is a scriptable browser, but it doesn't support JavaScript.
    • Run twill from within nose.
    • Can talk to WSGI directly.
    • It's lower level than Paste Fixture:
      • Unlike Paste Fixture, trivially toggle between direct WSGI or a live server.
  • figleaf:
    • A code coverage tool that's not restricted to just the CLI.
    • Code coverage is necessary, but not sufficient.
  • Continuous integration:
    • Continuous integration and buildbot are tremendously useful.
    • Distribute your building and testing across multiple platforms.
    • Tinderbox guys switched to buildbot.
    • For C and C++, he gave a plug for cmake.
    • You need to test in a cleanroom environment, on multiple platforms, in a developer neutral way.
    • Use a Subversion post commit hook to launch it.
  • Most important recommendations:
    • Start with some unit tests, some functional tests, and buildbot.
    • Build test fixtures as you need them, instead of ahead of time.
    • He's not a fan of test driven development.
      • This blew me away since he's foremost in the Python testing community.


Grig Gheorghiu said…
Shannon -- glad you found the tutorial useful! We'll put the slides online at some point, and add links to the tools we mentioned in the presentation.

jjinux said…
Thanks, Grig.

Happy Hacking!
Unknown said…
Hi Shannon,

I just wanted to say thanks for the great notes! :-) They helped me "get" the different types of tests a bit better.

I also decided to blog about your notes here.

Anyway, thanks again,
Unknown said…
Hi Shannon,

Your notes are enlightening. I've been using Selenium mostly because there are Firefox extensions that really help, like Selenium IDE. The IDE also allows you to test an app that hits multiple sites. I need this ability for what I'm doing.



Popular posts from this blog

Ubuntu 20.04 on a 2015 15" MacBook Pro

I decided to give Ubuntu 20.04 a try on my 2015 15" MacBook Pro. I didn't actually install it; I just live booted from a USB thumb drive which was enough to try out everything I wanted. In summary, it's not perfect, and issues with my camera would prevent me from switching, but given the right hardware, I think it's a really viable option. The first thing I wanted to try was what would happen if I plugged in a non-HiDPI screen given that my laptop has a HiDPI screen. Without sub-pixel scaling, whatever scale rate I picked for one screen would apply to the other. However, once I turned on sub-pixel scaling, I was able to pick different scale rates for the internal and external displays. That looked ok. I tried plugging in and unplugging multiple times, and it didn't crash. I doubt it'd work with my Thunderbolt display at work, but it worked fine for my HDMI displays at home. I even plugged it into my TV, and it stuck to the 100% scaling I picked for the othe

ERNOS: Erlang Networked Operating System

I've been reading Dreaming in Code lately, and I really like it. If you're not a dreamer, you may safely skip the rest of this post ;) In Chapter 10, "Engineers and Artists", Alan Kay, John Backus, and Jaron Lanier really got me thinking. I've also been thinking a lot about Minix 3 , Erlang , and the original Lisp machine . The ideas are beginning to synthesize into something cohesive--more than just the sum of their parts. Now, I'm sure that many of these ideas have already been envisioned within , LLVM , Microsoft's Singularity project, or in some other place that I haven't managed to discover or fully read, but I'm going to blog them anyway. Rather than wax philosophical, let me just dump out some ideas: Start with Minix 3. It's a new microkernel, and it's meant for real use, unlike the original Minix. "This new OS is extremely small, with the part that runs in kernel mode under 4000 lines of executable code.&quo

Haskell or Erlang?

I've coded in both Erlang and Haskell. Erlang is practical, efficient, and useful. It's got a wonderful niche in the distributed world, and it has some real success stories such as CouchDB and Haskell is elegant and beautiful. It's been successful in various programming language competitions. I have some experience in both, but I'm thinking it's time to really commit to learning one of them on a professional level. They both have good books out now, and it's probably time I read one of those books cover to cover. My question is which? Back in 2000, Perl had established a real niche for systems administration, CGI, and text processing. The syntax wasn't exactly beautiful (unless you're into that sort of thing), but it was popular and mature. Python hadn't really become popular, nor did it really have a strong niche (at least as far as I could see). I went with Python because of its elegance, but since then, I've coded both p