Skip to main content

Web Design: Faking Alpha Blending with gifs

pngs are nicer than gifs because they have true alpha blending, not just transparency. However, they don't work in IE. I'm using the "pngfix.js" script to make alpha blending work in IE, but it's just not perfect. The divs that the script adds mess up my CSS. True alpha blending becomes important if you're rendering your image on a complex background such as a gradient.

I found a suitable workaround. If I start with a png and get it to look right in the browser, I can grab a screen shot. Then I trim the outside of the image to make it transparent. Hence, the actual background is "hard coded" into the gif along the edges of where it becomes transparent so that true alpha blending is not necessary, but most of the image is still transparent so that the complex background shows through. Best of all, the gifs are a lot smaller than the original pngs.

I'm sure this trick is well known, but it was new to me. Oh the depths I go through to make IE users happy!

Comments

Anonymous said…
You're wasting your time, IE 7 has proper transparent PNG support with alpha channels, and will be forced on all IE uses in about a months time.

-- Neil
Anonymous said…
You probably should use the PNG by resort to the GIF only if IE6 is detected. You should be able to do it all in javascript.
Anonymous said…
How did I type "resort" there instead of default?
jjinux said…
> You're wasting your time, IE 7 has proper transparent PNG support with alpha channels, and will be forced on all IE uses in about a months time.

I only it were that simple!
Anonymous said…
Why bother doing it with a browser+screenshot when you can do it in any image editor?
jjinux said…
> Why bother doing it with a browser+screenshot when you can do it in any image editor?

That's a good question. It's because I'm using a complex background (gradient, etc.). I can use Firefox to show me how the image should ideally look on the complex background. Then, I can take a screenshot to get it to work in IE. Using transparency around the outside of the image gives me a little wiggle room to be off by a pixel or so, but along the edges of the logo (or whatever) the alpha blending looks mostly right.
Anonymous said…
"You're wasting your time, IE 7 ... will be forced on all IE uses in about a months time."

Dude, you're so wrong. IE6 will be here to haunt us for a long time to come. Here it is March 2007, IE7 is out and still how many corporate desktops still don't have IE7? Lots.

It is amazing how many clueless sheep use that POS they call IE6.
Anonymous said…
"It is amazing how many clueless sheep use that POS they call IE6."

Some of those sheep happen to be potential clients/customers and we still need to reach as many people as possible. Support for IE6 should not be disregarded quite yet, it is still very much used.
Unknown said…
"Some of those sheep happen to be potential clients/customers and we still need to reach as many people as possible. Support for IE6 should not be disregarded quite yet, it is still very much used."

And that's exactly the problem: IE6 sucks, it's old.. Been around since 2000 or so, and will still be around quite some time, sadly.

Any idea how much hassle many webdesigners have to go through to get their websites to work in IE6? IE7 is better, but still far off from FF or many others..

Popular posts from this blog

Ubuntu 20.04 on a 2015 15" MacBook Pro

I decided to give Ubuntu 20.04 a try on my 2015 15" MacBook Pro. I didn't actually install it; I just live booted from a USB thumb drive which was enough to try out everything I wanted. In summary, it's not perfect, and issues with my camera would prevent me from switching, but given the right hardware, I think it's a really viable option. The first thing I wanted to try was what would happen if I plugged in a non-HiDPI screen given that my laptop has a HiDPI screen. Without sub-pixel scaling, whatever scale rate I picked for one screen would apply to the other. However, once I turned on sub-pixel scaling, I was able to pick different scale rates for the internal and external displays. That looked ok. I tried plugging in and unplugging multiple times, and it didn't crash. I doubt it'd work with my Thunderbolt display at work, but it worked fine for my HDMI displays at home. I even plugged it into my TV, and it stuck to the 100% scaling I picked for the othe

ERNOS: Erlang Networked Operating System

I've been reading Dreaming in Code lately, and I really like it. If you're not a dreamer, you may safely skip the rest of this post ;) In Chapter 10, "Engineers and Artists", Alan Kay, John Backus, and Jaron Lanier really got me thinking. I've also been thinking a lot about Minix 3 , Erlang , and the original Lisp machine . The ideas are beginning to synthesize into something cohesive--more than just the sum of their parts. Now, I'm sure that many of these ideas have already been envisioned within Tunes.org , LLVM , Microsoft's Singularity project, or in some other place that I haven't managed to discover or fully read, but I'm going to blog them anyway. Rather than wax philosophical, let me just dump out some ideas: Start with Minix 3. It's a new microkernel, and it's meant for real use, unlike the original Minix. "This new OS is extremely small, with the part that runs in kernel mode under 4000 lines of executable code.&quo

Haskell or Erlang?

I've coded in both Erlang and Haskell. Erlang is practical, efficient, and useful. It's got a wonderful niche in the distributed world, and it has some real success stories such as CouchDB and jabber.org. Haskell is elegant and beautiful. It's been successful in various programming language competitions. I have some experience in both, but I'm thinking it's time to really commit to learning one of them on a professional level. They both have good books out now, and it's probably time I read one of those books cover to cover. My question is which? Back in 2000, Perl had established a real niche for systems administration, CGI, and text processing. The syntax wasn't exactly beautiful (unless you're into that sort of thing), but it was popular and mature. Python hadn't really become popular, nor did it really have a strong niche (at least as far as I could see). I went with Python because of its elegance, but since then, I've coded both p