Skip to main content

Linux: Ubuntu 6.06 on Dell Latitude D610

I just installed Ubuntu 6.06 on my Dell Latitude D610. I love it! You start with a live CD. Hence, you can "try before you buy". Then, when you're ready, you double-click the "Install" icon; you don't even have to burn another CD.

Compared to Ubuntu 5.10, a lot of polish has been added. Since I came from a Fedora background, I was impressed to see that Ubuntu has caught up with all the polish that Fedora has (graphical installer, graphical boot, etc.). Furthermore, despite the fact that I installed it the day after it came out, the Wiki had already been updated with instructions on how to get deal with proprietary formats such as MP3s, Windows video, Flash, etc.

As far as hardware goes, everything pretty much just worked--even hibernate and suspend! To support the builtin wireless, I had to use NDIS. Here are my abbreviated instructions:
Add the ndiswrapper-utils package.
Download the driver from ftp://ftp.us.dell.com/network/R102320.EXE.
mkdir driver
cd driver
unzip ../R102320.EXE
ndiswrapper -i bcmwl5.inf
ndiswrapper -l
ndiswrapper -m
Reboot.  I'm not sure if this is necessary.
Setup the network settings as usual.
If the card doesn't work, make sure you didn't hit some function key that turns off the wireless in the BIOS.
All in all, I'm stoked. :)

Comments

jjinux said…
Oops, I was wrong about ndiswrapper. It seems that things are done differently in 6.06. It's not working. It *looks* like it's working, but it acts as if it can't see the AP. This is going to take me a little while to fix, but it looks like other people have had success.
12:07 AM
Anonymous said…
I can't install 6.06, it hangs when the kernel reaches 100%
7:31 PM
jjinux said…
I got wireless working. I decided to stick with ndiswrapper instead of the reverse-engineered Broadcom driver.

See here for complete instructions. Here are my abbreviated instructions:

echo 'blacklist bcm43xx' |
sudo tee -a /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist
rmmod bcm43xx
rmmod ndiswrapper
Installed ndiswrapper-utils.
Used driver from here.
mkdir driver
cd driver
unzip ../R102320.EXE
ndiswrapper -i bcmwl5.inf
ndiswrapper -l
ndiswrapper -m
modprobe ndiswrapper
Setup the network settings as usual.
If the card doesn't work, make sure you didn't hit some function key that turns off the wireless in the BIOS.
4:28 AM
Christophe Poucet said…
Hello,

I have the same setup as you. Ubuntu LTS 6.06 on a Dell Laptop D610. I am curious which graphics card you got with your laptop. I personally have the ATI one and I'm having some issues with the driver (right now I'm using dropin .so replacement as suggested somewhere in the forums, but I get a bug everytime I launch open-office).

Cheers
12:22 AM
jjinux said…
Sorry, I don't remember, and I don't have this laptop anymore because I changed jobs. I didn't explicitly say I upgraded my video card driver, so that means I was still using the standard X driver.
10:56 AM
Timmy said…
Er, Ubuntu doesn't come from a Fedora background at all--it's actually based off of Debian.
2:17 PM
jjinux said…
Sorry, when I said, "Coming from a Fedora background", I meant that *I* was coming from a Fedora background ;)

Ubuntu is based on Debian, of course ;)
2:42 PM
jjinux said…
I updated the text to make it more clear.
2:44 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ubuntu 20.04 on a 2015 15" MacBook Pro

I decided to give Ubuntu 20.04 a try on my 2015 15" MacBook Pro. I didn't actually install it; I just live booted from a USB thumb drive which was enough to try out everything I wanted. In summary, it's not perfect, and issues with my camera would prevent me from switching, but given the right hardware, I think it's a really viable option. The first thing I wanted to try was what would happen if I plugged in a non-HiDPI screen given that my laptop has a HiDPI screen. Without sub-pixel scaling, whatever scale rate I picked for one screen would apply to the other. However, once I turned on sub-pixel scaling, I was able to pick different scale rates for the internal and external displays. That looked ok. I tried plugging in and unplugging multiple times, and it didn't crash. I doubt it'd work with my Thunderbolt display at work, but it worked fine for my HDMI displays at home. I even plugged it into my TV, and it stuck to the 100% scaling I picked for the othe
1 comment
Read more

ERNOS: Erlang Networked Operating System

I've been reading Dreaming in Code lately, and I really like it. If you're not a dreamer, you may safely skip the rest of this post ;) In Chapter 10, "Engineers and Artists", Alan Kay, John Backus, and Jaron Lanier really got me thinking. I've also been thinking a lot about Minix 3 , Erlang , and the original Lisp machine . The ideas are beginning to synthesize into something cohesive--more than just the sum of their parts. Now, I'm sure that many of these ideas have already been envisioned within Tunes.org , LLVM , Microsoft's Singularity project, or in some other place that I haven't managed to discover or fully read, but I'm going to blog them anyway. Rather than wax philosophical, let me just dump out some ideas: Start with Minix 3. It's a new microkernel, and it's meant for real use, unlike the original Minix. "This new OS is extremely small, with the part that runs in kernel mode under 4000 lines of executable code.&quo
50 comments
Read more

Haskell or Erlang?

I've coded in both Erlang and Haskell. Erlang is practical, efficient, and useful. It's got a wonderful niche in the distributed world, and it has some real success stories such as CouchDB and jabber.org. Haskell is elegant and beautiful. It's been successful in various programming language competitions. I have some experience in both, but I'm thinking it's time to really commit to learning one of them on a professional level. They both have good books out now, and it's probably time I read one of those books cover to cover. My question is which? Back in 2000, Perl had established a real niche for systems administration, CGI, and text processing. The syntax wasn't exactly beautiful (unless you're into that sort of thing), but it was popular and mature. Python hadn't really become popular, nor did it really have a strong niche (at least as far as I could see). I went with Python because of its elegance, but since then, I've coded both p
66 comments
Read more