Skip to main content

Linux: Ubuntu 5.10 on Dell Inspiron B130

If you read my last post, you may be relieved to hear that I did not set my laptop on fire. Ubuntu is working great! It even supported suspend to disk out of the box! I haven't been able to do this in a good five years. The only mildly tricky thing was that I needed to follow the instructions on this forum in order to get it to support WXGA resolutions (i.e. 1280x800). I'll probably need to use NDIS to get the wireless card to work, but I haven't gotten to that yet.

I guess I should go write a Linux on Laptops page now.


Julian Yap said…
yes. go with Ubuntu 5.10. It rocks in so many ways it's not funny.
jjinux said…
Ugh, I just spent a couple hours trying to get wireless to work. I'm beginning to suspect that this laptop doesn't even have a wireless card. I know that it should be a Dell 1370 miniPCI card, but when I look in BIOS, it says the miniPCI slot is empty. There's nothing in /var/log/messages, dmesg, or lspci that shows the Broadcom card. I think I'll just give up and fall back to my old PCMCIA wireless card.

By the way, stupid Broadcom!
jjinux said…
No PCMCIA slot?!? AAARRGGGG!!!!!!!!
Anonymous said…
mabe try usb?
jjinux said…
Yep, you're right. USB is my only option.
Anonymous said…
I just installed Ubuntu (breezy badger) on my Dell B130. I have been a hardcore Redhat/Fedora user for over 7 years now but after reading your post I figuring I would try something new.

Ubuntu installed perfectly! I had sound support out of the box as well as everything else just working. I followed your post and found the 855resolution trick to get my 1280x800 resolution working.

The only trouble I had was getting the Dell Truemobile 1370 minipci card to work. After about 6 hours of reading the ubuntu forums and 10 or so failed install attempts, I finally got it to work. Turns out the ndiswrapper that synaptic installs will not work on this machine. I downloaded the latest source from sourceforge, installed the build essentials package and gcc 3.4 (VERY IMPORTANT, default gcc 4.0 will not compile the source!!!) compiled ndiswrapper and followed the simple instructions on the ubuntu forums a bang! It worked!!

Installing gcc 3.4 and compiling the latest source was the key!!
jjinux said…
Thanks for the helpful comment!
Anonymous said…
Shannon, I'm curious to know if you were successful in getting the wireless to work under Ubuntu. I recently purchased a B130, and it seems well suited to Linux if (and only if) I can get wireless working under it. Your thoughts?
jjinux said…
Well, my laptop didn't come with a mini-PCI card, so I haven't tried the mini-PCI card that might come with yours. My buddy told me that I can buy them aftermarket online, so I'm going to try that. I assume it'll be the same deal as with my Latitude D610--an unsupported card that requires NDIS. By the way, there's now an open source Broadcom driver, although it still requires some firmware futzing. That means that you don't *have* to use NDIS. There's more information about it on the Ubuntu wiki if that's what you're using. Anyway, if all else fails, there's always NDIS.

Popular posts from this blog

Ubuntu 20.04 on a 2015 15" MacBook Pro

I decided to give Ubuntu 20.04 a try on my 2015 15" MacBook Pro. I didn't actually install it; I just live booted from a USB thumb drive which was enough to try out everything I wanted. In summary, it's not perfect, and issues with my camera would prevent me from switching, but given the right hardware, I think it's a really viable option. The first thing I wanted to try was what would happen if I plugged in a non-HiDPI screen given that my laptop has a HiDPI screen. Without sub-pixel scaling, whatever scale rate I picked for one screen would apply to the other. However, once I turned on sub-pixel scaling, I was able to pick different scale rates for the internal and external displays. That looked ok. I tried plugging in and unplugging multiple times, and it didn't crash. I doubt it'd work with my Thunderbolt display at work, but it worked fine for my HDMI displays at home. I even plugged it into my TV, and it stuck to the 100% scaling I picked for the othe

ERNOS: Erlang Networked Operating System

I've been reading Dreaming in Code lately, and I really like it. If you're not a dreamer, you may safely skip the rest of this post ;) In Chapter 10, "Engineers and Artists", Alan Kay, John Backus, and Jaron Lanier really got me thinking. I've also been thinking a lot about Minix 3 , Erlang , and the original Lisp machine . The ideas are beginning to synthesize into something cohesive--more than just the sum of their parts. Now, I'm sure that many of these ideas have already been envisioned within , LLVM , Microsoft's Singularity project, or in some other place that I haven't managed to discover or fully read, but I'm going to blog them anyway. Rather than wax philosophical, let me just dump out some ideas: Start with Minix 3. It's a new microkernel, and it's meant for real use, unlike the original Minix. "This new OS is extremely small, with the part that runs in kernel mode under 4000 lines of executable code.&quo

Haskell or Erlang?

I've coded in both Erlang and Haskell. Erlang is practical, efficient, and useful. It's got a wonderful niche in the distributed world, and it has some real success stories such as CouchDB and Haskell is elegant and beautiful. It's been successful in various programming language competitions. I have some experience in both, but I'm thinking it's time to really commit to learning one of them on a professional level. They both have good books out now, and it's probably time I read one of those books cover to cover. My question is which? Back in 2000, Perl had established a real niche for systems administration, CGI, and text processing. The syntax wasn't exactly beautiful (unless you're into that sort of thing), but it was popular and mature. Python hadn't really become popular, nor did it really have a strong niche (at least as far as I could see). I went with Python because of its elegance, but since then, I've coded both p