Skip to main content

Haskell: Breadth-first Tree Traversal

As an exercise, I implemented breadth-first tree traversal (instead of the much more common depth-first tree traversal) in Haskell. It took me about 3 hours, mainly because I haven't even finished reading the turorial yet. It really struck me how truly lazy Haskell is! My own language, Squeamish, had lazy evaluation, but in Haskell, you have to somewhat bend over backwards with the imperative stuff to say, "Yeah, really, I'm done defining stuff. Uh, can you actually, uh, do some evaluation or something, and, uh, maybe even print the answer?"
{- Implement breadth-first tree traversal.

Name: Shannon -jj Behrens
Date: Tue Dec 13 03:18:34 PST 2005 -}

module Main where

-- The main definition of a tree.
data Tree a = Leaf a | Branch a (Tree a) (Tree a)

-- Depth-first tree traversal.
depthFirst :: Tree a -> [a]
depthFirst (Leaf x) = [x]
depthFirst (Branch x left right) = depthFirst left ++ [x] ++
depthFirst right

-- Breadth-first tree traversal.
breadthFirst :: Tree a -> [a]
breadthFirst x = _breadthFirst [x]

_breadthFirst :: [Tree a] -> [a]
_breadthFirst [] = []
_breadthFirst xs = map treeValue xs ++
_breadthFirst (concat (map immediateChildren xs))

-- Get the value of a given tree.
treeValue :: Tree a -> a
treeValue (Leaf x) = x
treeValue (Branch x left right) = x

-- Get the immediate children of a tree.
immediateChildren :: Tree a -> [Tree a]
immediateChildren (Leaf x) = []
immediateChildren (Branch x left right) = [left, right]

-- Define some tree.
mytree = Branch "1"
(Branch "2"
(Leaf "4")
(Leaf "5"))
(Branch "3"
(Leaf "6")
(Leaf "7"))

{- 1
/ 2 3
/ \ / 4 5 6 7

Here's another.
mytree = Branch "0"
(Leaf "1")
(Branch "2"
(Branch "3"
(Leaf "4")
(Leaf "5"))
(Leaf "6"))

/ 1 2
/ 3 6
/ 4 5 -}

-- Create one "do" out of a list of things to do.
doList :: [IO ()] -> IO ()
doList = foldr (>>) (return ())

-- Main.
main :: IO ()
main = do doList (map putStrLn (breadthFirst mytree))
The result is:
$ runhugs main.hs


xerox said…
First of all, welcome to Haskell! :-)

I don't know if you're used to the IRC, but there is an active community on the #haskell channel on the network - you're very welcome to join!

Nice piece of code, buddy. I couldn't find a way to use the PRE or CODE or whatever tags in writing the comment, so, if you can, feel free to edit and fix it. Stupid

Before starting the trip, note that I just tried to write a more idiomatic (and well indented, at least to the most common taste) version of the code - for fun purposes mainly. Also, I want to show you some interesting properties emerging from your code, check them out.

Adding a 'deriving (..)' clause makes the datatype automatically instantiated in the given classes. Show and Read make values of the given type serializable via the functions 'read' and 'show'. Deriving Show is also useful for debugging purposes (if you happened to encounter any error of the type "No Show instance for (Tree a)" or something.)

data Tree a = Leaf a | Branch a (Tree a) (Tree a) deriving (Show,Read)

Right on!

depthFirst :: Tree a -> [a]
depthFirst (Leaf x) = [x]
depthFirst (Branch x l r) = depthFirst l ++ [x] ++ depthFirst r

Is it more common to hide the helper functions/values in a 'where' clause.

I don't know again how far are you on your tutorial, but keep this in mind: in the List Monad, return is \x -> [x], and bind is exactly concatMap: (>>=) = concatMap.

breadthFirst :: Tree a -> [a]
breadthFirst x = breadthFirst' [x]
where breadthFirst' :: [Tree a] -> [a]
breadthFirst' [] = []
breadthFirst' xs = map treeValue xs ++ breadthFirst' (xs >>= immediateChildren)

Pattern matching unused arguments is usually done by the means of the '_' notation. To please the eye.

treeValue :: Tree a -> a
treeValue (Leaf x) = x
treeValue (Branch x _ _) = x

immediateChildren :: Tree a -> [Tree a]
immediateChildren (Leaf _) = []
immediateChildren (Branch _ l r) = [l, r]

The next function is straightforwardly taken from the standard library,take a look around there:

levels = map (map treeValue) . takeWhile (not . null) . iterate (>>= immediateChildren) . return

Values of types instantiated in the 'Num a' typeclass (like Int, to say), along with many others (try :info Show in hugs or GHCi), are also instantiated 'Show a'; meaning that they can be feeded to the 'show' function, and by extension to 'print', latter.

Note that: print = putStrLn . show

mytree :: Tree Int
mytree = Branch 1
(Branch 2
(Leaf 4)
(Leaf 5))
(Branch 3
(Leaf 6)
(Leaf 7))

Your 'doLine' is just sequence_ from Control.Monad (the '_' means that the result of the actions in the list are discarded, take a look at the documentation:

But then, there is a simpler way:

main :: IO ()
main = mapM_ (print) (breadthFirst mytree)

Happy happy, joy joy.

-- xerox on #haskell
Anonymous said…
Dou have explanation for this ?
In OOP PHP implementation ?
jjinux said…
Sorry, no.

Popular posts from this blog

Ubuntu 20.04 on a 2015 15" MacBook Pro

I decided to give Ubuntu 20.04 a try on my 2015 15" MacBook Pro. I didn't actually install it; I just live booted from a USB thumb drive which was enough to try out everything I wanted. In summary, it's not perfect, and issues with my camera would prevent me from switching, but given the right hardware, I think it's a really viable option. The first thing I wanted to try was what would happen if I plugged in a non-HiDPI screen given that my laptop has a HiDPI screen. Without sub-pixel scaling, whatever scale rate I picked for one screen would apply to the other. However, once I turned on sub-pixel scaling, I was able to pick different scale rates for the internal and external displays. That looked ok. I tried plugging in and unplugging multiple times, and it didn't crash. I doubt it'd work with my Thunderbolt display at work, but it worked fine for my HDMI displays at home. I even plugged it into my TV, and it stuck to the 100% scaling I picked for the othe

ERNOS: Erlang Networked Operating System

I've been reading Dreaming in Code lately, and I really like it. If you're not a dreamer, you may safely skip the rest of this post ;) In Chapter 10, "Engineers and Artists", Alan Kay, John Backus, and Jaron Lanier really got me thinking. I've also been thinking a lot about Minix 3 , Erlang , and the original Lisp machine . The ideas are beginning to synthesize into something cohesive--more than just the sum of their parts. Now, I'm sure that many of these ideas have already been envisioned within , LLVM , Microsoft's Singularity project, or in some other place that I haven't managed to discover or fully read, but I'm going to blog them anyway. Rather than wax philosophical, let me just dump out some ideas: Start with Minix 3. It's a new microkernel, and it's meant for real use, unlike the original Minix. "This new OS is extremely small, with the part that runs in kernel mode under 4000 lines of executable code.&quo

Haskell or Erlang?

I've coded in both Erlang and Haskell. Erlang is practical, efficient, and useful. It's got a wonderful niche in the distributed world, and it has some real success stories such as CouchDB and Haskell is elegant and beautiful. It's been successful in various programming language competitions. I have some experience in both, but I'm thinking it's time to really commit to learning one of them on a professional level. They both have good books out now, and it's probably time I read one of those books cover to cover. My question is which? Back in 2000, Perl had established a real niche for systems administration, CGI, and text processing. The syntax wasn't exactly beautiful (unless you're into that sort of thing), but it was popular and mature. Python hadn't really become popular, nor did it really have a strong niche (at least as far as I could see). I went with Python because of its elegance, but since then, I've coded both p