Skip to main content

Python: Deeply Nested try/finally Statements

"""This is a convenient way to deeply nest try/finally statements."""

__docformat__ = "restructuredtext"

# Created: Tue Oct 11 08:42:23 PDT 2005
# Author: Shannon -jj Behrens
# Email:
# Copyright (c) Shannon -jj Behrens. All rights reserved.

from traceback import print_exc

def tryFinally(tasks, handleFinallyException=None):

"""This is a convenient way to deeply nest try/finally statements.

It is appropriate for complicated resource initialization and destruction.
For instance, if you have a list of 50 things that need to get intialized
and later destructed via using try/finally (especially if you need to
create the list dynamically) this function is appropriate.


tasks = [
((f_enter_0, enter_0_args, enter_0_kargs),
(f_exit_0, exit_0_args, exit_0_kargs)),

((f_enter_1, enter_1_args, enter_1_kargs),
(f_exit_1, exit_1_args, exit_1_kargs)),

((f_enter_2, enter_2_args, enter_2_kargs),
(f_exit_2, exit_2_args, exit_2_kargs))


f_enter_0(*enter_0_args, **enter_0_kargs)

f_enter_1(*enter_1_args, **enter_1_kargs)

f_enter_2(*enter_2_args, **enter_2_kargs)


f_exit_2(*exit_2_args, **exit_2_kargs)
except Exception, e:

f_exit_1(*exit_1_args, **exit_1_kargs)
except Exception, e:

f_exit_0(*exit_0_args, **exit_0_kargs)
except Exception, e:

See the example above. Note that you can leave out parts of the tuples
by passing shorter tuples. For instance, here are two examples::

# Second tuple missing.
((f_enter_2, enter_2_args, enter_2_kargs),)

# Leave out args or args and kargs.
(f_exit_2, exit_2_args))

Don't forget that a tuple of 1 item is written ``(item,)``. This is an
amazingly easy thing to do.

This is a callback that gets called if an exception, ``e``, is raised
in a finally block. By default, traceback.print_exc is called.


def defaultFinallyExceptionHandler(e):

def castTwoParts(first):
lenFirst = len(first)
default = ((), ())
max = len(default)
if lenFirst >gt; max:
raise ValueError("""tasks must be a list of tuples of the form (enterTuple, exitTuple).""", first)
return first + default[lenFirst:]

def doNothing(*args, **kargs):

def castFunctionArgsKargs(fTuple):
lenFTuple = len(fTuple)
default = (doNothing, (), {})
max = len(default)
if lenFTuple >gt; max:
raise ValueError("""Each tuple in tasks is a pair of tuples that look like (f, args, kargs).""",
return fTuple + default[lenFTuple:]

if not len(tasks):
if not handleFinallyException:
handleFinallyException = defaultFinallyExceptionHandler

first, others = tasks[0], tasks[1:]
first = castTwoParts(first)
first = (castFunctionArgsKargs(first[0]),
((fEnter, fEnterArgs, fEnterKargs),
(fExit, fExitArgs, fExitKargs)) = first

fEnter(*fEnterArgs, **fEnterKargs)
tryFinally(others, handleFinallyException)
fExit(*fExitArgs, **fExitKargs)
except Exception, e:

if __name__ == '__main__':

from cStringIO import StringIO

def printEverything(*args, **kargs): print >gt;>gt;buf, `args`, `kargs`
def refuseArgs(): print >gt;>gt;buf, "refused args"
def raiseValueError(): raise ValueError
def finallyExceptionHandler(e): print >gt;>gt;buf, "caught exception in finally"

tasks = [
((printEverything, ("enter_0_args",), {"in": "in"}),
(printEverything, ("exit_0_args",))),



result = """('enter_0_args',) {'in': 'in'}
() {}
refused args
caught exception in finally
('exit_0_args',) {}

buf = StringIO()
tryFinally(tasks, finallyExceptionHandler)
assert buf.getvalue() == result


Popular posts from this blog

Ubuntu 20.04 on a 2015 15" MacBook Pro

I decided to give Ubuntu 20.04 a try on my 2015 15" MacBook Pro. I didn't actually install it; I just live booted from a USB thumb drive which was enough to try out everything I wanted. In summary, it's not perfect, and issues with my camera would prevent me from switching, but given the right hardware, I think it's a really viable option. The first thing I wanted to try was what would happen if I plugged in a non-HiDPI screen given that my laptop has a HiDPI screen. Without sub-pixel scaling, whatever scale rate I picked for one screen would apply to the other. However, once I turned on sub-pixel scaling, I was able to pick different scale rates for the internal and external displays. That looked ok. I tried plugging in and unplugging multiple times, and it didn't crash. I doubt it'd work with my Thunderbolt display at work, but it worked fine for my HDMI displays at home. I even plugged it into my TV, and it stuck to the 100% scaling I picked for the othe

ERNOS: Erlang Networked Operating System

I've been reading Dreaming in Code lately, and I really like it. If you're not a dreamer, you may safely skip the rest of this post ;) In Chapter 10, "Engineers and Artists", Alan Kay, John Backus, and Jaron Lanier really got me thinking. I've also been thinking a lot about Minix 3 , Erlang , and the original Lisp machine . The ideas are beginning to synthesize into something cohesive--more than just the sum of their parts. Now, I'm sure that many of these ideas have already been envisioned within , LLVM , Microsoft's Singularity project, or in some other place that I haven't managed to discover or fully read, but I'm going to blog them anyway. Rather than wax philosophical, let me just dump out some ideas: Start with Minix 3. It's a new microkernel, and it's meant for real use, unlike the original Minix. "This new OS is extremely small, with the part that runs in kernel mode under 4000 lines of executable code.&quo

Haskell or Erlang?

I've coded in both Erlang and Haskell. Erlang is practical, efficient, and useful. It's got a wonderful niche in the distributed world, and it has some real success stories such as CouchDB and Haskell is elegant and beautiful. It's been successful in various programming language competitions. I have some experience in both, but I'm thinking it's time to really commit to learning one of them on a professional level. They both have good books out now, and it's probably time I read one of those books cover to cover. My question is which? Back in 2000, Perl had established a real niche for systems administration, CGI, and text processing. The syntax wasn't exactly beautiful (unless you're into that sort of thing), but it was popular and mature. Python hadn't really become popular, nor did it really have a strong niche (at least as far as I could see). I went with Python because of its elegance, but since then, I've coded both p